The Troubling Implications of PM in CJI's House

Fr. Gaurav Nair Fr. Gaurav Nair
16 Sep 2024

The viral images of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud side by side at a puja on Ganesh Chaturthi have sent shockwaves through the legal fraternity and citizens. While this may have appeared to be a personal event, the implications go far beyond. The executive and the judiciary playing bedfellows strikes at the heart of constitutional values—particularly the principle of the separation of powers.

The judiciary serves as an impartial arbiter, upholding the Constitution and checking the executive and legislative powers. The principle of separation of powers is enshrined in the Constitution. Article 50 mandates the State to separate the judiciary from the executive. This is the bedrock of public faith in the judiciary's independence and ability to deliver justice impartially.

When judges are seen in close personal interaction with political leaders, it sends a dangerous signal. Such interactions birth suspicions about the impartiality of past, present and future judgments. It is not without substance that Sanjay Raut of Shiv Sena (UBT) has called for the CJI to back off from making a judgement in Maharashtra. In a country where trust in institutions is already fragile, actions compromising the perception of independence have a lasting impact.

It is no secret that post-retirement positions for judges have always been contentious. Several retired judges have been appointed to commissions, tribunals, or political positions. It is concerning as judges might tailor their decisions to secure favourable engagements. This meeting, just two months before the CJI's retirement, has led to widespread speculation.

This incident cannot be viewed in isolation. There has been a growing concern over the judiciary's inaction in sanctioning the BJP's polarising actions. The judiciary has often failed to hold the government accountable on key issues, from electoral bonds to hate speech. Instead of taking a firm stance, the judiciary has allowed these matters to fester, leaving a vacuum filled by the ruling party with its own narrative.

This is further compounded by its failure to bring justice in cases involving right-wing violence. CJI Chandrachud was part of the bench that presided over the Ayodhya verdict, which ultimately handed over the disputed land to the Hindus. The judgment visibly sidestepped justice for the victims. The perpetrators, part of the Sangh Parivar, walked free. The decision was met with widespread dismay among those who expected the judiciary to deliver justice in one of India's most divisive conflicts.

Some argue that such interactions between the judiciary and the executive have historical precedents. However, these past transgressions cannot serve as a justification for continuing such practices. In fact, these instances should serve as warnings of the dangers posed when the judiciary allows itself to be drawn into the orbit of the executive. In a time of heightened political tension, religious polarisation, and increasing attacks on minorities, the judiciary's independence is more crucial than ever.

The public's disappointment is palpable. Many had hoped the CJI would stand as a beacon of judicial independence. This event has cast a long shadow over his legacy. It is a reminder that public trust in the judiciary can be undermined instantly by actions that suggest undue proximity to the executive.

Recent Posts

Our Prime Minister Modi is considered a "Vishwaguru" and a world leader. Why? Modi and his party won a thumping victory and formed the government for the third time. Many world leaders seek Modi's gui
apicture M L Satyan
27 Jan 2025
Labelling dissent as "anti-national" is against democracy and a clear indicator of unaccountability. True anti-national acts are those that weaponise communalism, violate constitutional principles, an
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
27 Jan 2025
The American people got a taste of Trump's plainly illegal actions on his first day in office. He signed a flurry of executive orders overriding orders issued by the outgoing Biden administration. On
apicture Joseph Maliakan
27 Jan 2025
The 47th US President's imperialistic policies and tendencies and disregard for constitutional norms are akin to authoritarian figures of yore. From threatening global agreements to ending birthright
apicture A. J. Philip
27 Jan 2025
To preserve India's democratic and republican nature, citizens must remain vigilant, engaged, and committed to constitutional values. Strengthening institutions, safeguarding minority rights, promotin
apicture Dr. Pauly Mathew Muricken
27 Jan 2025
Dr Rajendra Prasad emphasised that democracy depends on integrity, compromise, and capable leadership, not just the Constitution. Post-independence, socio-political failures, consumerism, ecological i
apicture Harasankar Adhikari
27 Jan 2025
Indian trade unions are facing declining membership, fragmented representation, and weakened bargaining power arising from economic shifts and widespread changes. The Industrial Relations Code 2020 ha
apicture Jose Vattakuzhy
27 Jan 2025
RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat's claim that Pranab Mukherjee endorsed 'ghar wapsi' has sparked controversy. It has not only raised religious but also constitutional, socio-economic and political concerns.
apicture Dr. John Singarayar
27 Jan 2025
Life is hardly respectable if it has no posers, tasks and labours. Again, life is hardly respectable if it has no joy, sleep, or love. The art of life lies in a constant readjustment to our surroundin
apicture Raja Purushothaman
27 Jan 2025
Even as selfish decisions are thrown out, it also whispers into our ears to reflect on why such a law was made. It whispers to each of us to think deeper than our present situation and realise the Con
apicture Robert Clements
27 Jan 2025