Temple vs Tapasya

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
16 Jan 2023
Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year.

In the late forties when the question of the reconstruction of Somnath temple came up, Gandhiji told Sardar Patel and others that he was in favour of rebuilding the temple, but it should not be done with government funds. It has to be undertaken wholly with private funds, Gandhiji was emphatic about it. When the time for its inauguration came, President Rajendra Prasad was invited to do that honour. He consulted Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru who dissuaded the former from it. Nehru told the President: “My dear Rajendra Babu, I confess that I do not like the idea of your associating yourself with a spectacular opening of the Somnath Temple. This is not merely visiting a temple, which can certainly be done by you or anyone else, but rather participating in a significant function which unfortunately has a number of implications.” Nehru was highlighting the principle of separating state form religion. It is another matter that the President later attended the inauguration of the temple. 

Cut to the present era. Addressing a public meeting in Tripura, which is going to polls in a month or two, Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year. It is appalling that the announcement came neither from the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra, which is overseeing the temple construction, nor any religious leader associated with it. It is equally important to recall that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the master of ceremonies and the official yajmaan during the Bhumi Pujan ceremony of the temple in 2020. The Modi government has travelled miles and miles from the Nehru government which had the principle of separation of state from religion as one of its core agenda. With the BJP, apparently under the tutelage of the Sangh Parivar, coming to power, such niceties and distinctions have vanished into thin air.   

Juxtapose this ostentatious and brazen politicization of religion with Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s unambiguous announcement that Bharat Jodo Yatra is not for political gain, but it is a ‘tapasya’ meant to fight hate, fear, disharmony and division of the society on caste and religious lines. Religion and its associated rituals make the ‘highway’ to people’s hearts. It is the easiest and surest method to exploit the ordinary mortals and manoeuvre the gullible public to garner votes. Rahul Gandhi’s Tapasya may or may not bring in political dividends. But, at a time when the country is in the thick of religious and caste upheavals; when religious fundamentalists and fanatics clamour for a Hindu Rashtra; when the main religious minorities are threatened with annihilation, the yatra for unity and harmony sends out its message loud and clear. 

The negativity of politicising religion has to be countered by the positivity of Rahul Gandhi’s call for tapasya. The country needs politicians who desist from cashing in on the naivety of people. As the BJP enters the final year of its second term in the Centre, tide seems to have turned against it. The party is frantically searching for a vote-catching ‘achievement’ that would catapult it to power again. What better means than ‘temple politics’ to garner votes. But such short-cuts to power would do colossal damage to the country. Rahul’s Tapasya route, on the other hand, would be the ideal path to keep the nation united.

Recent Posts

The current delimitation hullaballoo provides insight into democracy's struggle to balance representation and power. Rising tensions between the North and the South are not without reason. Given the B
apicture Aakash
10 Mar 2025
Emperor Aurangzeb was 88 years old and had ruled the country for 49 years when he died in 1707. Unlike any other leader, he had much to boast about. He ruled over a population of 150 million people. H
apicture A. J. Philip
10 Mar 2025
AI has revolutionised industries, but it mirrors the societal biases of those who created it. This is visible in the gender disparities exhibited by AI tools. From recruitment discrimination to skewed
apicture Jaswant Kaur
10 Mar 2025
India has undergone a radical political shift from its initial outlook. The increasing marginalisation of minorities, the rise of Hindutva majoritarianism, weaponisation of laws, and hate speech neces
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
10 Mar 2025
As the bulldozers continue to go on a rampage, demolishing and destroying the lives and homes of the vulnerable, it is time that the fascist and dictatorial rulers of the world realise that "this land
apicture Cedric Prakash
10 Mar 2025
Smartphone use in schools has become a global challenge. The detail lies in balancing education and well-being. While bans tackle classroom distractions and cyberbullying, some claim it hinders digita
apicture Anantha Padmanabhan
10 Mar 2025
Arunachal faces a dark turning point as the 1978 Freedom of Religion Act is revived. Peaceful coexistence is at stake as the BJP creates another Manipur-like situation. Have no lessons been learned?
apicture Chhotebhai
10 Mar 2025
A glance through Kerala's archive of traditional art forms reveals that folk songs originated from the philosophies of forefathers. With no language barriers to restrict them from communicating with e
apicture Pachu Menon
10 Mar 2025
Tamil Nadu's resistance to Hindi imposition has revealed the federation's insensitivity to diversity. The Centre's insistence on the three-language formula is a joke, given the declining multilinguali
apicture G Ramachandram
10 Mar 2025
As they say, actions speak louder than words—or, in this case, louder than tweets. So, Mr. Prime Minister, while the country appreciates the gesture, how about some solid policies, airtight laws, and
apicture Robert Clements
10 Mar 2025