Power-Hungry Centre

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
22 Mar 2021

Centralization of power is the trademark of autocracy. In a democracy, power should be with the people, and their elected representatives. Any law to the contrary, howsoever sugar-coated it may be, will put the axe to the root of democracy. This came to light in the Lok Sabha recently when the Centre introduced the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill 2021. Delhi has seen perennial clash, especially after the AAP government came to power, between the elected government led by the Chief Minister and the Lieutenant Governor. The problem arises mainly because of the ambiguities in the 1991 Act which established Delhi as a Union Territory with an elected Assembly. The conflict took a serious turn when the AAP government decided to implement some of its pro-people programmes. The Kejriwal government realized that the Lieutenant Governor was a stumbling block in implementing many of its policies as the latter insisted that files should be sent to him before executing any policy. 

This had led to a stalemate in governance especially during the previous term of the Kejriwal government. However, the Supreme Court’s verdict in 2018 led to a truce between the two warring centres of governance. The five-Judge Bench held that concurrence of the L-G was not necessary in taking decisions on subjects other than police, public order, and land. The Bench opined that if the elected government has to take permission from the L-G on each issue, it will be a negation of the principles of the representative form of governance and democracy. This verdict came as a relief for the Kejriwal government which then stopped sending many files to the L-G for his concurrence. As directed by the apex court, it was only keeping the L-G informed of the decisions taken by the government, and not taking prior permission.  

The Bill introduced in the Lok Sabha is apparently a negation of the Supreme Court verdict. The core of the controversy is that, according to the Bill, the expression ‘government’ referred to in any law to be made by the Assembly shall mean Lieutenant Governor. The Centre claims that the Bill is meant to define the powers and responsibilities of the government and the L-G as per the Supreme Court judgment. However, the purpose seems to gain backdoor entry and control the government through the office of the L-G, who is an appointee of the Centre. It is feared that this move will take away power from the elected government and the L-G will become the centre of governance. 

It is no secret that the BJP has not been able to come back to power in the national Capital after the first government led by it was defeated by the Congress party in 1998. Despite Narendra Modi’s coming to power at the Centre, the BJP has not been able to make much headway in the State politics. Even when the saffron party swept the polls in the general elections, it had to eat the dust in State elections. The new Bill is a clear indication that the Centre wants to have a bigger share in the governance pie of the National Capital Territory of Delhi. This sends out the message that the ruling party at the Centre is opposed to the autonomy of States and independence of elected governments. This is an ill-conceived move as power should rest with the elected government in a democracy.
 

Recent Posts

The Iranian war is a story of how greed, nations, leaders and alliances shape global conflict. A troubling question is also raised simultaneously: has India's once-independent foreign policy been repl
apicture A. J. Philip
09 Mar 2026
The 2026 Budget Session erupted as Rahul Gandhi was repeatedly blocked from citing MM Naravane's memoir, triggering suspensions and a no-confidence move against Om Birla. Gandhi accused Narendra Modi
apicture G Ramachandram
09 Mar 2026
Across India, ordinary citizens are pushing back against the rising hate speech and discrimination, defending minorities and upholding constitutional values. From solidarity protests to everyday acts
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
09 Mar 2026
Civil marriages under the Special Marriage Act once enabled interfaith and intercaste unions beyond religious barriers. New proposals like Gujarat's parental consent rule threaten adult autonomy, rais
apicture John Dayal
09 Mar 2026
The Supreme Court swiftly acted when a textbook questioned the judiciary. But what about broader NCERT revisions aimed at reshaping history and civic understanding? As ideological edits accumulate, a
apicture Oliver D'Souza
09 Mar 2026
India's empowerment narrative celebrates only "professional" success while overlooking the unpaid labour of millions of homemakers, who sustain families and the economy. Recognising domestic work as r
apicture Jaswant Kaur
09 Mar 2026
The Allahabad High Court reaffirmed that caste is determined by birth and remains unchanged by conversion or marriage. The ruling revives the larger constitutional debate: if caste persists after conv
apicture Jessy Kurian
09 Mar 2026
Your third stage Is discrimination, The tightening of rules Around the necks of the Dalit castes.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
09 Mar 2026
The tragic accident involving Sahil Dhaneshra, a 23-year-old youth brimming with promise, a wall adorned with medals, and the inconsolable anguish of a mother, has shaken the nation and compelled us t
apicture Richa Walia
09 Mar 2026
Indian men are extremely safety-conscious. We are so concerned about women's safety that we have decided the safest place for them is inside a cage designed entirely by us.
apicture Robert Clements
09 Mar 2026