Justice Derailed

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
22 Aug 2022
the nation cannot turn a deaf ear to the poignant question raised by Bilkis Bano: ‘How can justice for any woman end like this?’

The day every Indian was beseeched to hold the Tricolour in hand and have national anthem on lips, Bilkis Bano sat in a remote place in Gujarat with her body going numb, bereft of words, and her life coming crashing down. She was in shock unable to come to terms with what she heard: Eleven convicts sentenced to life imprisonment for her gang-rape and murder of her family members have been released from jail. The Gujarat government had remitted their life-term and permitted premature release from the prison. 

Adding insult to injury, people gathered outside the Godhra jail, with ladoos and garlands, to give a grand welcome to the convicts. Coincidently, on the same day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had waxed eloquent on Nari Shakti: Can we not pledge to get rid of everything in our behaviour, culture and everyday life that humiliates and demeans women?” The opposite happened, not in any other state, but in his own state where he reigned supreme before becoming the Prime Minister. 

The Gujarat government has come out with an unconvincing justification for its decision: A panel constituted by the state government had approved a plea for remission of their life sentence. According to reports, the committee that recommended the remission had five office-bearers of the Bharatiya Janata Party, including two MLAs; the rest of the members were government appointees. The grant of remission may be justified taking course to technicalities. But it goes against the spirit of court verdicts and informed public opinion that pleas of perpetrators of heinous crimes like rape and murder should not be considered for remission of life-term. 

Bilkis Bano had fought a tortuous legal battle to get the conviction of the 11 who had, initially, managed to escape the long arm of the law. The Gujarat government and the police had apparently manipulated the FIR, medical reports and post-mortem report; and evidences were destroyed. Though the trial had started in a court in Ahmedabad, it was apparently heading for a ‘disastrous closure’. 

The Supreme Court transferred the case to Mumbai after Bilkis expressed apprehension of harm to witnesses and tampering with evidence. She found a ray of hope when, in 2008, the Special Court in Mumbai sentenced the 11 to life-imprisonment. It is this much delayed justice, which reached the door-steps of Bilkis after much trial and tribulation, that has now been derailed by the remission of the sentence.  

Dispensation of justice is getting more and more communalized in the country. State after state, especially in BJP-ruled ones, the minorities find the going increasingly tough. In Uttar Pradesh, the government has withdrawn scores of riot cases in which the victims are undeniably Muslims. In many cases, those who have given out a battle cry against minority communities are going scot-free; similar is the case of hate-mongers from the Hindutva brigade who have called for genocide of people belonging to a minority community; the accused are roaming around like heroes who have won a battle. 

The situation has degenerated to a level in which culprits and victims are seen through the prism of communalism. In this scenario, the nation cannot turn a deaf ear to the poignant question raised by Bilkis Bano: ‘How can justice for any woman end like this?’
 

Bilkis Bano Gujarat life imprisonment Gujarat government Godhra jail Narendra Modi Nari Shakti women Bharatiya Janata Party Supreme Court justice Uttar Pradesh riot cases Muslims minority communities Hindutva brigade Indian Currents Issue 35 2022 Indian Currents Magazine

Recent Posts

Fifty years after the Emergency, the debate has shifted from suspended Democracy to whether democratic institutions can be hollowed out while elections continue and constitutional forms remain outward
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
06 Jul 2026
Is India moving forward or slipping backwards? Growing concerns over democratic institutions, civil liberties, economic inequality, and constitutional values have kept the national debate over whether
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
06 Jul 2026
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has declared the right to walk on safe, well-maintained footpaths a fundamental right, placing pedestrians at the centre of constitutional protection and challe
apicture Dr. Pauly Mathew Muricken
06 Jul 2026
The passport controversy has raised uncomfortable questions about citizenship, administrative accountability and legal interpretation. Far from settling the issue, official assertions have triggered f
apicture Joseph Maliakan
06 Jul 2026
If Stan Swamy, the Martyr, were alive today, he would be in the midst of the Adivasis. His life would be very simple and frugal. He would eat their food, sing their songs, and dance with them. He woul
apicture Cedric Prakash
06 Jul 2026
Synthetic narcotics, digital trafficking and organised crime are reshaping India's drug landscape. As Goa, Kerala and neighbouring states witness alarming spikes in abuse and fatalities, the country's
apicture Pachu Menon
06 Jul 2026
They did not fall like accidents. They were arranged: Dalit bodies laid out In the neat geometry of hate.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
06 Jul 2026
one day we will wake up to discover that while we faithfully believed it was day, our rulers had quietly turned it into night...
apicture Robert Clements
06 Jul 2026
As new restrictions tighten around churches and civil society organisations, those likely to suffer most are the poor, the marginalised, and the forgotten communities who rely on faith-based instituti
apicture John Dayal
29 Jun 2026
From Chhattisgarh to North Korea, Nigeria to Iraq, the faces of persecution differ, but the outcome remains the same: shrinking freedoms, shattered communities and an international human-rights system
apicture Oliver D'Souza
29 Jun 2026