India’s Soul Fights for Survival

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
11 Jan 2021

Delhi is shivering in biting cold; untimely rains have added to the misery. In the midst of wintry winds, thousands of farmers are huddled together on the borders of the national Capital. They are there to save their future; to protect their lifeline from being taken away by corporate houses. They see danger lurking between the lines of the three controversial farm laws that were bulldozed through Parliament by the Narendra Modi government. They are not asking for the moon; they want their agricultural practices, followed for decades, which keep their hearth fires burning, not to be tampered with. Hundreds of children, teenagers and women, apart from thousands of menfolk, would not have flocked to the Delhi borders if their life’s support system is not under threat. 

The Modi Government has gone wrong from the word go. The founding fathers of the Constitution, with their feet rooted in ground reality, were aware that the issues of farmers vary from State to State. Hence, they put agriculture in State list so that laws could be framed by each State according to the requirements. But, the mandarins in Delhi, far removed from the villages and with godfathers in corporate houses, decided to make sweeping changes to the existing laws, undermining those for whom they were made. The farmers, the real stakeholders, have been pushed to the margins. If the proposed beneficiaries do not welcome the new laws, only an authoritarian government would think of thrusting them down their throat. 

Over 50 farmers have reported died on the sites of agitation on the Delhi’s borders. Though they have fallen victims to the vagaries of nature, yet the real culprit is the insensitive government. They had to give up their lives because of a government which seemingly kowtows to corporate houses whose hearts lie with money, not people. The government has held seven rounds of talks with the farmers without eliciting any result. There are many roads open to the government to wriggle out of the situation; there are many ways the farmers can be placated. The government can very well put on hold the contentious laws till a compromise is reached with the stakeholders. Or else, the government can let the State Assemblies to decide whether they want to adopt the new farm laws or reject them. This is possible only if the government wants to be seen with the farmers, rather than with big business houses.

Reforms are meant to bring cheers to the life of people, not to cheat them of their means of sustenance. Hence, laws should not be formulated without consultations with those for whom they are meant for. The resolve and energy being shown by the agitating farmers reveal how agitated they are on the passing of the controversial laws. Their fear of not getting remunerative prices, at least the MSP, if the laws are implemented, is not without basis. The government should see reason in what the farmers are scared of. Instead, if it tries to tire out the farmers through prolonged talks, it could boomerang. Those with soiled feet cannot be bluffed for long.
 

Recent Posts

Bengal once welcomed missionaries who built schools, hospitals and presses, enriching the region's education, healthcare and reform. Today, priests are told to leave their parishes. The irony is devas
apicture CM Paul
17 Aug 2026
With Christians constituting barely 2.3 per cent of India's population, the charge of mass forced conversion defies logic. Yet anti-conversion laws pivot charity into "allurement," suspicion and crime
apicture Chhotebhai
17 Aug 2026
Dr RB Sreekala's work brings out something beautiful in Koodashappana: how a German Jesuit, Kerala's Malayalam tradition and Sanskrit learning came together to tell the story of Jesus in the language
apicture A. J. Philip
17 Aug 2026
Eighty years after Independence, the question is whether Indians remain free. With increasing threats to citizenship, dissent, faith and liberty, Swaraj demands a second struggle to defend freedom for
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
17 Aug 2026
The Old Testament is insistent on this point almost to the point of severity. When Moses approached the burning bush, he was told, "Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on
apicture Dr K. M. George
17 Aug 2026
Nehru's Cabinet was surrounded by persons who did not share his ideology. They were retained mostly out of a sense of loyalty to old colleagues, persons who fought side by side for Independence.
apicture G Ramachandram
17 Aug 2026
You think I am a forbidden fruit, unworthy of your love. But I never think You are a forbidden fruit, Even though India forbids your Nagalim.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
17 Aug 2026
The truly confident leader does not need ridicule. He does not humiliate opponents or turn every speech into a performance about his own greatness. His strength is visible in restraint, fairness, humi
apicture Robert Clements
17 Aug 2026
Political independence was never Gandhi's final destination. He envisioned a Republic rooted in constitutional values, social justice and human dignity. Every Independence Day invites a single questio
apicture Joe Eruppakkatt
10 Aug 2026
The Arthashastra counsels engagement, accountability and informed leadership—not disappearance. A government that retreats from Parliament while students demand justice betrays not only democratic con
apicture A. J. Philip
10 Aug 2026