A Death Knell for NGOs

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
28 Sep 2020

Every bad law is justified under the guise of ‘good intention’. The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act Amendment Bill passed by the Parliament is no exception. The government has defended it spelling out the good intentions behind it: To bring in transparency and stop misuse of foreign contribution. But the stark reality is far from what the government claims. The new law will sound the death knell of non-governmental organisations in the country. It will cut the lifeline of majority of organisations as they will be starved of funds. It bans transfer of funds from the FCRA account of one NGO to the account of another one. Herein lies the trap. Big NGOs, with nation-wide operations, collaborate with partner organisations at local level for better outreach. The grassroot-level NGOs are the backbone of relief, rehabilitation and development work in the country as they have the wherewithal to do so. On the other hand, bigger NGOs function as the funding agencies of the local partner organizations. The new regulations on fund transfer will strangulate the grassroot-level organisations as they will be left penniless. 

This apart, there are other provisions in the new law that will hamper the working of NGOs. The amendment brings out the ‘hypocrisy’ in the ‘words and deeds’ of the present regime. It does not see any incongruity in PM CARES fund receiving foreign contributions. But transferring funds from the FCRA account of an NGO to the account of another becomes anathema for the government. It is the same government that has allowed political parties to receive foreign funds from Indian-registered foreign companies through electoral bonds, which is shrouded in secrecy. The biggest beneficiary of the electoral bonds is none other than the BJP.

The functioning of the NGOs will hit hard by reducing the cap in administrative expenditure from 50 per cent to 20 per cent of the funds received during a fiscal year. To justify the new rule, the government has come out with the lame excuse that it will prevent the NGOs from turning extravagant. The government has conveniently forgotten the fact that a part of the administrative expenses is going towards enhancing the work efficiency of employees and such other professional activities; this is apart from payment of salaries, professional fees, utility bills, travel and other such expenditure. 

By permitting the suspension of the license of ‘erring’ NGOs for more than six months, the government seems to be indirectly making ‘inconvenient’ NGOs out of action for as long as it wants. The renewal of FCRA license too has been made subject to the satisfaction of the Ministry after its enquiry. This is nothing but putting hurdles and making the renewal subject to the ‘whims and fancies’ of those entrusted with the enquiry. The government claims that several cases of misuse of funds have come to light. The existing laws are enough to suspend or cancel the license of NGOs if they are found to indulge in illegal or unlawful activities. It is unwise to burn the house to smoke out a rat. The government seems to have some agenda in keeping the NGOs on a tight leash.  


 

Recent Posts

Our Prime Minister Modi is considered a "Vishwaguru" and a world leader. Why? Modi and his party won a thumping victory and formed the government for the third time. Many world leaders seek Modi's gui
apicture M L Satyan
27 Jan 2025
Labelling dissent as "anti-national" is against democracy and a clear indicator of unaccountability. True anti-national acts are those that weaponise communalism, violate constitutional principles, an
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
27 Jan 2025
The American people got a taste of Trump's plainly illegal actions on his first day in office. He signed a flurry of executive orders overriding orders issued by the outgoing Biden administration. On
apicture Joseph Maliakan
27 Jan 2025
The 47th US President's imperialistic policies and tendencies and disregard for constitutional norms are akin to authoritarian figures of yore. From threatening global agreements to ending birthright
apicture A. J. Philip
27 Jan 2025
To preserve India's democratic and republican nature, citizens must remain vigilant, engaged, and committed to constitutional values. Strengthening institutions, safeguarding minority rights, promotin
apicture Dr. Pauly Mathew Muricken
27 Jan 2025
Dr Rajendra Prasad emphasised that democracy depends on integrity, compromise, and capable leadership, not just the Constitution. Post-independence, socio-political failures, consumerism, ecological i
apicture Harasankar Adhikari
27 Jan 2025
Indian trade unions are facing declining membership, fragmented representation, and weakened bargaining power arising from economic shifts and widespread changes. The Industrial Relations Code 2020 ha
apicture Jose Vattakuzhy
27 Jan 2025
RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat's claim that Pranab Mukherjee endorsed 'ghar wapsi' has sparked controversy. It has not only raised religious but also constitutional, socio-economic and political concerns.
apicture Dr. John Singarayar
27 Jan 2025
Life is hardly respectable if it has no posers, tasks and labours. Again, life is hardly respectable if it has no joy, sleep, or love. The art of life lies in a constant readjustment to our surroundin
apicture Raja Purushothaman
27 Jan 2025
Even as selfish decisions are thrown out, it also whispers into our ears to reflect on why such a law was made. It whispers to each of us to think deeper than our present situation and realise the Con
apicture Robert Clements
27 Jan 2025