A Death Knell for NGOs

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
28 Sep 2020

Every bad law is justified under the guise of ‘good intention’. The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act Amendment Bill passed by the Parliament is no exception. The government has defended it spelling out the good intentions behind it: To bring in transparency and stop misuse of foreign contribution. But the stark reality is far from what the government claims. The new law will sound the death knell of non-governmental organisations in the country. It will cut the lifeline of majority of organisations as they will be starved of funds. It bans transfer of funds from the FCRA account of one NGO to the account of another one. Herein lies the trap. Big NGOs, with nation-wide operations, collaborate with partner organisations at local level for better outreach. The grassroot-level NGOs are the backbone of relief, rehabilitation and development work in the country as they have the wherewithal to do so. On the other hand, bigger NGOs function as the funding agencies of the local partner organizations. The new regulations on fund transfer will strangulate the grassroot-level organisations as they will be left penniless. 

This apart, there are other provisions in the new law that will hamper the working of NGOs. The amendment brings out the ‘hypocrisy’ in the ‘words and deeds’ of the present regime. It does not see any incongruity in PM CARES fund receiving foreign contributions. But transferring funds from the FCRA account of an NGO to the account of another becomes anathema for the government. It is the same government that has allowed political parties to receive foreign funds from Indian-registered foreign companies through electoral bonds, which is shrouded in secrecy. The biggest beneficiary of the electoral bonds is none other than the BJP.

The functioning of the NGOs will hit hard by reducing the cap in administrative expenditure from 50 per cent to 20 per cent of the funds received during a fiscal year. To justify the new rule, the government has come out with the lame excuse that it will prevent the NGOs from turning extravagant. The government has conveniently forgotten the fact that a part of the administrative expenses is going towards enhancing the work efficiency of employees and such other professional activities; this is apart from payment of salaries, professional fees, utility bills, travel and other such expenditure. 

By permitting the suspension of the license of ‘erring’ NGOs for more than six months, the government seems to be indirectly making ‘inconvenient’ NGOs out of action for as long as it wants. The renewal of FCRA license too has been made subject to the satisfaction of the Ministry after its enquiry. This is nothing but putting hurdles and making the renewal subject to the ‘whims and fancies’ of those entrusted with the enquiry. The government claims that several cases of misuse of funds have come to light. The existing laws are enough to suspend or cancel the license of NGOs if they are found to indulge in illegal or unlawful activities. It is unwise to burn the house to smoke out a rat. The government seems to have some agenda in keeping the NGOs on a tight leash.  


 

Recent Posts

Communal hatred, seeded by colonial divide-and-rule and revived by modern majoritarianism, is corroding India's syncretic culture. Yet acts of everyday courage remind us that constitutional values and
apicture Ram Puniyani
16 Feb 2026
What appears as cultural homage is, in fact, political signalling. By elevating Vande Mataram symbolism over inclusion, the state is diminishing the national anthem, unsettling hard-won consensus, and
apicture A. J. Philip
16 Feb 2026
States are increasingly becoming laboratories of hate; the experiment will ultimately consume the nation itself. The choice before India is stark: reaffirm constitutional citizenship, or allow adminis
apicture John Dayal
16 Feb 2026
Mamata Banerjee's personal appearance before the Supreme Court of India has transformed a procedural dispute over SIR into a constitutional warning—questioning whether institutions meant to safeguard
apicture Oliver D'Souza
16 Feb 2026
This is a book by two redoubtable Jesuit scholars. Lancy Lobo is currently the Research Director of the Indian Social Institute in New Delhi, while Denzil Fernandes was its former Executive Director.
apicture Chhotebhai
16 Feb 2026
The cry "Why am I poor?" exposes a world where fear of the other, corrupted politics, and dollar-driven power reduce millions to "children of a lesser god." Abundance will coexist with deprivation, an
apicture Peter Fernandes
16 Feb 2026
O Water! There is a facade of democracy. In which caste is appropriated As a religious tool, To strengthen the caste hierarchy For touching their water.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
16 Feb 2026
From Washington's muscle diplomacy to Hindutva's cultural majoritarianism, a dangerous erosion of values is reshaping global and Indian politics. When power replaces principle and identity overrides j
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
16 Feb 2026
In today's world, governance is not merely about policies. It is about performance. The teleprompter screen must glow. The sentences must glide. The applause must arrive on cue.
apicture Robert Clements
16 Feb 2026
From Godhra to Assam, a once-neutral word has been weaponised to stigmatise, harass, and exclude a section of the people. This is not a linguistic accident but a political design wherein power turns l
apicture A. J. Philip
09 Feb 2026