The Rich Get Booster Doses

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
08 Mar 2021

“Robbing Peter for paying Paul” is a phrase used in the context of taking from one person and giving to another. The phrase is commonly heard while analyzing State or Central budgets wherein Finance Ministers tweak tax rates and introduce policies, bringing relief for some and hardships for others. It is time to paraphrase the phrase as fuel and gas prices are skyrocketing. The government is robbing the common man to enrich oil companies and the government. It eludes common sense that the domestic fuel prices are going northward when the international crude oil price is going in the opposite direction. The taxes on petrol and diesel amount to anything between 140 per cent to 180 per cent of the base price. In comparison, the taxes are around 20 per cent in the US and 45 per cent in Japan. It is a clear case of jacking up fuel prices to fill up the coffers of oil companies and the government.

The purpose of liberalization initiated in 1991 was to make sure that the benefits of growth trickle down to the poor. But, as many experts point out, it hasn’t happened; neither it is happening under this government which has made ‘sabka saath, sabka vikas’ as its main slogan. Instead, the lopsided policies of the government are creating more billionaires. Profit of corporate houses saw a sharp hike during the pandemic when the country’s GDP growth rate was going into negative and millions of people were struggling to make ends meet. The number of billionaires in dollar terms has seen a sharp rise in the last few years while lakhs have lost jobs and industries in small scale sector have closed shop. The net effect is that income inequality is increasing though the government’s public averments are to the contrary. The trickle-down effect of the government policies and programmes, which should have boosted the income of the poor and the marginalised, is not taking place; on the other hand, the opposite is happening, thereby making the poor, poorer and the rich, richer.     

This is evident in the farming sector too, where a majority of people are still engaged, with the farmers’ income growing at snail’s pace. The Prime Minister’s assertion of doubling their income by 2022 is nothing but hollow talk. An inter-ministerial committee on “Doubling of Farmers’ Income” was set up in April 2016 to recommend strategies to achieve this goal. Instead of working on this direction, the government decided to introduce three controversial farm laws which the farmers perceive as a move to help corporate houses to enter the agricultural sector and rake in profit. A government committed to better the income of farmers would not hesitate to ensure minimum support price for their produce because it is the only sure-shot to achieve the target. Unless a price is assured for their produce, there is no surety that their income will go up. The government’s resistance to bring in a law to ensure Minimum Support Price is proof for its proclivity for lip service. The farmers see a hidden agenda in the government’s decision. While the rich continue to get booster doses, the poor are left to fend for themselves.  
 

Recent Posts

Bengal once welcomed missionaries who built schools, hospitals and presses, enriching the region's education, healthcare and reform. Today, priests are told to leave their parishes. The irony is devas
apicture CM Paul
17 Aug 2026
With Christians constituting barely 2.3 per cent of India's population, the charge of mass forced conversion defies logic. Yet anti-conversion laws pivot charity into "allurement," suspicion and crime
apicture Chhotebhai
17 Aug 2026
Dr RB Sreekala's work brings out something beautiful in Koodashappana: how a German Jesuit, Kerala's Malayalam tradition and Sanskrit learning came together to tell the story of Jesus in the language
apicture A. J. Philip
17 Aug 2026
Eighty years after Independence, the question is whether Indians remain free. With increasing threats to citizenship, dissent, faith and liberty, Swaraj demands a second struggle to defend freedom for
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
17 Aug 2026
The Old Testament is insistent on this point almost to the point of severity. When Moses approached the burning bush, he was told, "Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on
apicture Dr K. M. George
17 Aug 2026
Nehru's Cabinet was surrounded by persons who did not share his ideology. They were retained mostly out of a sense of loyalty to old colleagues, persons who fought side by side for Independence.
apicture G Ramachandram
17 Aug 2026
You think I am a forbidden fruit, unworthy of your love. But I never think You are a forbidden fruit, Even though India forbids your Nagalim.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
17 Aug 2026
The truly confident leader does not need ridicule. He does not humiliate opponents or turn every speech into a performance about his own greatness. His strength is visible in restraint, fairness, humi
apicture Robert Clements
17 Aug 2026
Political independence was never Gandhi's final destination. He envisioned a Republic rooted in constitutional values, social justice and human dignity. Every Independence Day invites a single questio
apicture Joe Eruppakkatt
10 Aug 2026
The Arthashastra counsels engagement, accountability and informed leadership—not disappearance. A government that retreats from Parliament while students demand justice betrays not only democratic con
apicture A. J. Philip
10 Aug 2026