Dissent is Anti-national in India

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
22 Feb 2021

Lawlessness doesn’t mean only the absence of law; it also means faulty interpretation and wrong execution of law. The result is the same. Ordinary mortals will be put to untold miseries and absurd agonies. The country is going through such a situation wherein law enforcement agencies are going after people left, right and centre. Voices of dissent, messages of criticism, expression of disapproval, protests, rallies, and every such democratic method hitherto used for censuring a government and its wings have become eyesores and anti-national activities overnight. The result: The government and its agencies are coming down heavily on people, twisting and tweaking laws. This has provoked a Delhi court to observe: The law of sedition cannot be invoked to quieten the disquiet under the pretense of muzzling the miscreants. 

The number of ‘anti-nationals’ and ‘seditionists’, in the eye of the government, is phenomenally growing in the country. Ever since the JNU protests of 2016 and the arrest of student-leader Kanhaiya Kumar and others, the two terms have been consistently coming up in the lexicon of the government and its agencies. Later, another vicious term, ‘urban Naxals’, was added to the list. During the anti-CAA protests, there was a spurt of arrests of protesters under stringent laws. Now, the farmers’ agitation has put such arrests in top gear. The arrest of Disha Ravi, a 22-year-old environmental activist, charging her with sedition and conspiracy, over a ‘toolkit’ on farmers’ stir, has made the government’s intentions clear. Adding fuel to fire, the police had issued non-bailable arrest warrants against two persons, but luckily both of them have been granted anticipatory bail. Reports suggest that the police are planning to file FIRs against more people in this regard.  

Anyone daring to question the government or support those critical of the government are threatened with arrest and prison life. The laws are made to turn on their head as it happened in the case of Stan Swamy and many other rights activists and intellectuals. In some cases, the investigating agencies, confirming their dubious record of manipulating evidences and witnesses, seem to have tampered with computers, as reported in the case of Rona Wilson, to strengthen the case. The inhuman face of the administration and the police stands out glaringly in the way arrests are executed. In the case of Disha, there are doubts about the police bulldozing and taking her to Delhi after arrest without following the procedure prescribed by the Supreme Court. 

While the State is taking recourse to high-handed response to democratic protests and campaigns, those who incite people for violence are going around scot-free. The long arm of the law does not reach anywhere near them. Instead, a protective arm of the government throws a safety net around them. The government’s actions betray both arrogance and nervousness. The latest developments could attract international embarrassment and criticism. The image of India as the world’s largest democracy could take a hit if law-abiding citizens are treated with iron hand. Expressing dissent and articulating disagreement is proof of a thriving democracy. Trying to put a lid on such activities and going all-out to snuff them out is the opposite of the rule of the people, by the people and for the people.
 

Recent Posts

Bengal once welcomed missionaries who built schools, hospitals and presses, enriching the region's education, healthcare and reform. Today, priests are told to leave their parishes. The irony is devas
apicture CM Paul
17 Aug 2026
With Christians constituting barely 2.3 per cent of India's population, the charge of mass forced conversion defies logic. Yet anti-conversion laws pivot charity into "allurement," suspicion and crime
apicture Chhotebhai
17 Aug 2026
Dr RB Sreekala's work brings out something beautiful in Koodashappana: how a German Jesuit, Kerala's Malayalam tradition and Sanskrit learning came together to tell the story of Jesus in the language
apicture A. J. Philip
17 Aug 2026
Eighty years after Independence, the question is whether Indians remain free. With increasing threats to citizenship, dissent, faith and liberty, Swaraj demands a second struggle to defend freedom for
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
17 Aug 2026
The Old Testament is insistent on this point almost to the point of severity. When Moses approached the burning bush, he was told, "Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on
apicture Dr K. M. George
17 Aug 2026
Nehru's Cabinet was surrounded by persons who did not share his ideology. They were retained mostly out of a sense of loyalty to old colleagues, persons who fought side by side for Independence.
apicture G Ramachandram
17 Aug 2026
You think I am a forbidden fruit, unworthy of your love. But I never think You are a forbidden fruit, Even though India forbids your Nagalim.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
17 Aug 2026
The truly confident leader does not need ridicule. He does not humiliate opponents or turn every speech into a performance about his own greatness. His strength is visible in restraint, fairness, humi
apicture Robert Clements
17 Aug 2026
Political independence was never Gandhi's final destination. He envisioned a Republic rooted in constitutional values, social justice and human dignity. Every Independence Day invites a single questio
apicture Joe Eruppakkatt
10 Aug 2026
The Arthashastra counsels engagement, accountability and informed leadership—not disappearance. A government that retreats from Parliament while students demand justice betrays not only democratic con
apicture A. J. Philip
10 Aug 2026