Confrontational Attitudes and a Need to Focus

Fr. Gaurav Nair Fr. Gaurav Nair
01 Jul 2024

As Prime Minister Narendra Modi embarks on his third consecutive term, there is no discernible shift in his political demeanour. His confrontational stance threatens the purpose of the Parliament. The Parliament is an institution for meaningful dialogue and problem-solving, not for political squabbles.

The 1975 Emergency is undoubtedly a dark chapter in India's democratic history. Regardless of what played behind the scenes, it warrants critical reflection and reminds us of the importance of all parties upholding democratic values and institutions. However, constantly invoking this period to provoke political opponents decades later serves no constructive purpose. Such behaviour suggests misplaced priorities.

President Murmu, PM Modi, and Speaker Dhankhar's repeated references to the Emergency seem more like a political strategy to malign the Congress Party. It is obvious that they are endeavouring to reach what they are apparently condemning. This approach is blatantly divisive. It would have put a dent in the stature of their offices, which should rise above partisan politicking, had it any left. Modi had virtually run the Parliament alone, steamrolling policies in the absence of a Leader of the Opposition. The provocation seems to be partly an expression of the displeasure felt at the loss of leeway in doing what he wanted.

The space for rational and informed discussion shrinks when the government views the Opposition as an enemy that needs to be vanquished. This confrontational stance will contribute to the already toxically charged political and communal climate and discourage consensus-building. In India, where diverse views and interests must be reconciled, the prospects for reaching agreements on important policy issues diminish when political discourse is dominated by antagonism.

What India needs at this juncture is statesmanship, not showmanship. PM Modi should have understood this after the nation agreed to disagree with him, showing its displeasure with the considerable loss of independent mandate. He should have adopted a tone of cooperation and inclusivity towards the Opposition, even if to show that he had gained some wisdom after his histrionic meditation at Vivekananda Rock Memorial.

If left unchecked, PM Modi will continue to erode the foundations of India's democratic institutions, as he has for the past decade. While the onus is on the government to create a conducive environment, the Opposition also has a crucial role. They must rise above mere obstructionism. They should stand united in holding the government accountable and participate actively in the legislative process. By doing so, they can help restore the Parliament's focus issues that threaten the nation.

Only by fostering an environment of mutual respect and cooperation can the Parliament fulfil its role as the cornerstone of Indian democracy. Or do the PM and his cronies wish to impose his "godhood" on us through another Emergency, one of their own design this time?

Recent Posts

Communal hatred, seeded by colonial divide-and-rule and revived by modern majoritarianism, is corroding India's syncretic culture. Yet acts of everyday courage remind us that constitutional values and
apicture Ram Puniyani
16 Feb 2026
What appears as cultural homage is, in fact, political signalling. By elevating Vande Mataram symbolism over inclusion, the state is diminishing the national anthem, unsettling hard-won consensus, and
apicture A. J. Philip
16 Feb 2026
States are increasingly becoming laboratories of hate; the experiment will ultimately consume the nation itself. The choice before India is stark: reaffirm constitutional citizenship, or allow adminis
apicture John Dayal
16 Feb 2026
Mamata Banerjee's personal appearance before the Supreme Court of India has transformed a procedural dispute over SIR into a constitutional warning—questioning whether institutions meant to safeguard
apicture Oliver D'Souza
16 Feb 2026
This is a book by two redoubtable Jesuit scholars. Lancy Lobo is currently the Research Director of the Indian Social Institute in New Delhi, while Denzil Fernandes was its former Executive Director.
apicture Chhotebhai
16 Feb 2026
The cry "Why am I poor?" exposes a world where fear of the other, corrupted politics, and dollar-driven power reduce millions to "children of a lesser god." Abundance will coexist with deprivation, an
apicture Peter Fernandes
16 Feb 2026
O Water! There is a facade of democracy. In which caste is appropriated As a religious tool, To strengthen the caste hierarchy For touching their water.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
16 Feb 2026
From Washington's muscle diplomacy to Hindutva's cultural majoritarianism, a dangerous erosion of values is reshaping global and Indian politics. When power replaces principle and identity overrides j
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
16 Feb 2026
In today's world, governance is not merely about policies. It is about performance. The teleprompter screen must glow. The sentences must glide. The applause must arrive on cue.
apicture Robert Clements
16 Feb 2026
From Godhra to Assam, a once-neutral word has been weaponised to stigmatise, harass, and exclude a section of the people. This is not a linguistic accident but a political design wherein power turns l
apicture A. J. Philip
09 Feb 2026