Confrontational Attitudes and a Need to Focus

Fr. Gaurav Nair Fr. Gaurav Nair
01 Jul 2024

As Prime Minister Narendra Modi embarks on his third consecutive term, there is no discernible shift in his political demeanour. His confrontational stance threatens the purpose of the Parliament. The Parliament is an institution for meaningful dialogue and problem-solving, not for political squabbles.

The 1975 Emergency is undoubtedly a dark chapter in India's democratic history. Regardless of what played behind the scenes, it warrants critical reflection and reminds us of the importance of all parties upholding democratic values and institutions. However, constantly invoking this period to provoke political opponents decades later serves no constructive purpose. Such behaviour suggests misplaced priorities.

President Murmu, PM Modi, and Speaker Dhankhar's repeated references to the Emergency seem more like a political strategy to malign the Congress Party. It is obvious that they are endeavouring to reach what they are apparently condemning. This approach is blatantly divisive. It would have put a dent in the stature of their offices, which should rise above partisan politicking, had it any left. Modi had virtually run the Parliament alone, steamrolling policies in the absence of a Leader of the Opposition. The provocation seems to be partly an expression of the displeasure felt at the loss of leeway in doing what he wanted.

The space for rational and informed discussion shrinks when the government views the Opposition as an enemy that needs to be vanquished. This confrontational stance will contribute to the already toxically charged political and communal climate and discourage consensus-building. In India, where diverse views and interests must be reconciled, the prospects for reaching agreements on important policy issues diminish when political discourse is dominated by antagonism.

What India needs at this juncture is statesmanship, not showmanship. PM Modi should have understood this after the nation agreed to disagree with him, showing its displeasure with the considerable loss of independent mandate. He should have adopted a tone of cooperation and inclusivity towards the Opposition, even if to show that he had gained some wisdom after his histrionic meditation at Vivekananda Rock Memorial.

If left unchecked, PM Modi will continue to erode the foundations of India's democratic institutions, as he has for the past decade. While the onus is on the government to create a conducive environment, the Opposition also has a crucial role. They must rise above mere obstructionism. They should stand united in holding the government accountable and participate actively in the legislative process. By doing so, they can help restore the Parliament's focus issues that threaten the nation.

Only by fostering an environment of mutual respect and cooperation can the Parliament fulfil its role as the cornerstone of Indian democracy. Or do the PM and his cronies wish to impose his "godhood" on us through another Emergency, one of their own design this time?

Recent Posts

India's ambitious overhaul of its labour law architecture—by consolidating 29 existing laws into four comprehensive Labour Codes—is projected as a landmark reform intended to simplify compliance, prom
apicture Jose Vattakuzhy
01 Dec 2025
Across India, workers and unions are resisting labour codes that dismantle decades of hard-won rights. As corporate elites are celebrated, labourers face exclusion, precarity and silencing. The battle
apicture Prakash Louis
01 Dec 2025
I have always considered myself a temple-goer. That description may seem inadequate, for my journeys have taken me from the southern tip of the subcontinent to the Himalayan foothills, tracing not mer
apicture A. J. Philip
01 Dec 2025
Sixteen BLO deaths in three weeks expose the brutal human cost of an impossible SIR timeline. As overworked field staff collapse under pressure, the Election Commission denies responsibility, and an a
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
01 Dec 2025
Two Jesuit moments, a century apart, reveal a stark contrast: courage that welcomed Gandhi, and caution that silenced a Stan Swamy lecture. As we mark the feast of St. Xavier, we are asked not to judg
apicture Fr. Sebastian James, SJ
01 Dec 2025
O Father of India, on this sacred day, Not in prayer of sorrow do we gather, For your light is still dancing in our hearts. A fire that never dies, never ends.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
01 Dec 2025
As 2025 draws to a close, the Constitution's guarantees feel symbolic to millions. With courts, policing, voter rolls and land rights tilting in one direction, religious minorities confront a future w
apicture John Dayal
01 Dec 2025
Beneath the speeches of Constitution Day lies a nation in peril. Rights are eroded, institutions compromised, minorities targeted, and democracy is hollowed out. Ambedkar's warnings echo today, demand
apicture Cedric Prakash
01 Dec 2025
Aeschylus, the Greek tragedian, wanted to know how he was destined to die. Hence, he consulted a fortune teller who told him the truth and nothing but the truth. "You would meet your death under a fal
apicture P. Raja
01 Dec 2025
Picture two engines joined together. Both powerful, both capable of pulling a nation forward. But one engine pulls east and the other west. They strain. They struggle. And the train goes nowhere.
apicture Robert Clements
01 Dec 2025