CAA: Foundation Stone for a Hindu Exclusive Nation

Joseph Maliakan Joseph Maliakan
18 Mar 2024

The Constitution of India grants citizenship through birth, descent and migration. Religion was never a criterion. The various provisions for the grant of citizenship are codified in Articles 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. They reflect the basic secular character of the Constitution of India. According to The Citizenship Act 1955 enacted by Parliament, religion is not a criterion to regulate the grant and termination of citizenship. However, with the Amendment and Rules, citizenship will be granted solely based on religion.

The CAA 2019 facilitates the grant of citizenship to persecuted minorities, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian illegal migrants from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh, who entered India on or before 31 December 2014. The CAA, in violation of the primary secular feature of the Indian Constitution, excludes Muslims from its purview and, therefore, discriminates against Muslims solely based on religion.

The Union Government has argued that the CAA was enacted to provide fast-track citizenship to persecuted minorities in neighbouring countries. Still, the statute or rules do not mention persecution, and proof of persecution is not required before citizenship is granted.

The CAA and Rules also violate the basis of the governance of the states and the union: federalism. Opposition-ruled states Kerala and West Bengal have said they will not implement the CAA. However, under the rules framed by the Union Government, the process of granting citizenship to non-Muslims of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh has been framed in such a way that the states have little or no role.

Citizenship applications under the Citizenship Act 1955 were hitherto made to district collectors, who are under the administrative control of the state governments. The new rules provide for an Empowered Committee and a District Level Committee (DLC) to be set up by the Union Government to receive and process the citizenship applications. Applications will be submitted to the DLC, and the Empowered Committee will decide.

The Empowered Committee will be headed by a Director (Census Operations). It will have as its members an officer of the Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau (under the Ministry of Home Affairs) of the rank of deputy secretary or above, the Foreign Regional Registration Officer (FRRO), the State Informatics Officer of the National Informatics Centre (under the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology), and the Post Master General (under the Ministry of Communications) of the state. A state home department and Railways representative will be invited to the Committee.

The DLC shall consist of the District Informatics Officer or District Informatics Assistant of the concerned district collector's office, not below the rank of Naib Tehsildar or equivalent, and the railway jurisdictional station master.

The challenges to the CAA 2019 pending in the Supreme Court have pointed out that the Act violates Article 14 because it denies equality before the law and equal protection of laws. Article 14 applies to all persons, not just citizens. The CAA denies fast-track citizenship to Muslims. It also excludes people from countries other than Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh. That the Ahmadiyya Muslims in Pakistan are one of the most persecuted minorities is well known, but the CAA is silent on them because of the religious criteria.

The CAA 2019 also does not extend the benefit of fast-track citizenship to persecuted minorities in other neighbouring countries, such as Myanmar and Sri Lanka, where the Rohingya and Tamils are persecuted minorities.

The CAA gives citizenship to the target group of illegal migrants even if they do not have valid travel documents as specified in the Citizenship Act 1955. The CAA presumes that these people who entered India faced religious persecution in these countries and has reduced the period of citizenship through naturalisation from 11 years to five years.

Under the CAA rules, immigrants from the three countries need only prove their country of origin, religion, date of entry to India, and knowledge of an Indian language. The rules regarding proof of country of origin have been considerably relaxed. The earlier requirement of a valid passport issued by Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh, along with a valid residential permit from India, has been eliminated.

A birth certificate, educational certificate, identity document of any kind, licence or certificate, or land or tenancy document issued by these countries that prove the applicant was their citizen would serve as proof of citizenship. These documents will be admissible beyond their validity period and can also be used to establish the applicant's religion.

In Assam, the CAA conflicts directly with Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which grants citizenship to those who migrated to Assam before 24 March 1971. Even those who came after 1971 but before 31 December 2014 will be granted citizenship with the CAA. But the 1971 cutoff did not discriminate against Muslims; the 2014 cutoff does!

Recent Posts

The Haryana election results highlight Congress's internal crisis, over-reliance on regional satraps, and failure to engage marginalised communities, particularly Dalits. The party's leadership neglec
apicture Vidya Bhushan Rawat
14 Oct 2024
Open Letter to Kejriwal
apicture A. J. Philip
14 Oct 2024
The tragic Hathras incident of child sacrifice highlights the dangers of blind faith, even among the educated. Promoting scientific temper, as the Constitution encourages, is crucial to countering sup
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
14 Oct 2024
It is important to understand that by providing a protective shield to abusive husbands, we are not only perpetuating violence but also sending a message to the younger generation that "women do not h
apicture Jaswant Kaur
14 Oct 2024
Rahul Gandhi's remarks on religious rights in the US were used by the BJP and RSS to attack him while manipulating religious sentiments for political gain. They have historically been culpable of atte
apicture Ram Puniyani
14 Oct 2024
Religion often becomes a reason for discrimination, division, hatred and distance. This is unpardonable. Instead, religion has to be a tool for unity. ‘Whatever be the religion, it suffices if one is
apicture Dr. M. D. Thomas
14 Oct 2024
When a book has a foreword by a celebrity cancer 'survivor', the reader can be assured that the author is embarking on a narrative journey that will take him through the travails of a disease that has
apicture Pachu Menon
14 Oct 2024
Does religion today indeed lead to God? Why is there growing religious intolerance, violence, and manipulation? True religion advocates understanding the core values of faith, promoting unity, and emb
apicture Dr Martin Valiyaparambil VC
14 Oct 2024
Even as India bade a tearful farewell to a giant of a man, let us not bid adieu to the values the Tata name so firmly established in the country. For many decades, people swore by the brand name Tata.
apicture Robert Clements
14 Oct 2024
Sonam Wangchuk's detainment at the Delhi border reflects the government's growing fear of public support for peaceful movements, challenging the state's neglect. Sonam's ability to mobilise people and
apicture A. J. Philip
07 Oct 2024