Untenable Laws, Ulterior Motives

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
04 Jan 2021

The BJP-ruled States are making laws on expected line: To take the country faster on the road to Hindu nationalism or Hindu Rashtra as envisaged by the Sangh Parivar and its ideologues. All pronouncements to the contrary are only lip-service to fool the naïve minorities. The doubting Thomases need to look into the recent anti-conversion laws brought through Ordinance route by the Uttar Pradesh and the Madhya Pradesh governments. The Ordinances were introduced hurriedly to take on the ‘love jihad’ which has become a pet theme for the saffron party. In the process, they have introduced untenable laws which is violative of the constitutional rights of citizens. By making “conversion through marriage or by any other forcible means” a cognizable offence, marriage between two persons of different faiths has been made an ‘unlawful activity’ unless certain conditions are fulfilled. 

The Allahabad High Court’s recent verdict giving green signal for a young couple, from two different religions, to tie the knot is a vindication of citizens’ right in this regard. In a slap on the face of the UP police, the court quashed an FIR that accused a Muslim man of abducting a Hindu woman and forcibly marrying her. The court’s scathing observation that “two adults are free to choose their partner” and ‘that it is their right to freedom of choice as to whom they would like to live with’ should open the eyes of the U.P. and the M.P. governments on the untenability of the Ordinances they have introduced.

The case of Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Bill in the form of an Ordinance is a mockery as the State already has a Freedom of Religion Act which came into existence in 1968, the second State to enact a law in this regard. The earlier law makes conversion from one religion to another by force or fraud a crime. The present Ordinance seems to be a desperate effort to include inter-faith marriage too as a non-bailable crime. Moreover, more teeth have been added to the previous law by making punishment under the Ordinance harsher. It is interesting to note that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has time and again made it clear that his government is resolute in reducing the number of laws existing in the country as many of them have become redundant. Multiplication of laws would only add workload to the overburdened courts. The redundancy of the Ordinance becomes clear when one realizes that the conviction rate under the existing Freedom of Religion Act is few and far between.

Under the present regimes in BJP-ruled Centre and the States, law-making is guided by the saffron party’s set agenda, apparently to smoothen the path to Hindu nation. Hence, people’s interests take a backseat; instead, the interests of the Sangh Parivar, corporates and individuals take the centre stage. We got to see it in the passing of three controversial farm laws, the Citizenship Amendment Act, the repeal of Article 370, and so on. The same government is unwilling to act on the demand of millions of farmers for bringing a law that will ensure them Minimum Support Price for their produce. Laws should be made to unite and serve the people, not to divide and delude them.
 

HinduRashtra anticonversionlaws editorial SureshMathew news magazine indiancurrents

Recent Posts

The Iranian war is a story of how greed, nations, leaders and alliances shape global conflict. A troubling question is also raised simultaneously: has India's once-independent foreign policy been repl
apicture A. J. Philip
09 Mar 2026
The 2026 Budget Session erupted as Rahul Gandhi was repeatedly blocked from citing MM Naravane's memoir, triggering suspensions and a no-confidence move against Om Birla. Gandhi accused Narendra Modi
apicture G Ramachandram
09 Mar 2026
Across India, ordinary citizens are pushing back against the rising hate speech and discrimination, defending minorities and upholding constitutional values. From solidarity protests to everyday acts
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
09 Mar 2026
Civil marriages under the Special Marriage Act once enabled interfaith and intercaste unions beyond religious barriers. New proposals like Gujarat's parental consent rule threaten adult autonomy, rais
apicture John Dayal
09 Mar 2026
The Supreme Court swiftly acted when a textbook questioned the judiciary. But what about broader NCERT revisions aimed at reshaping history and civic understanding? As ideological edits accumulate, a
apicture Oliver D'Souza
09 Mar 2026
India's empowerment narrative celebrates only "professional" success while overlooking the unpaid labour of millions of homemakers, who sustain families and the economy. Recognising domestic work as r
apicture Jaswant Kaur
09 Mar 2026
The Allahabad High Court reaffirmed that caste is determined by birth and remains unchanged by conversion or marriage. The ruling revives the larger constitutional debate: if caste persists after conv
apicture Jessy Kurian
09 Mar 2026
Your third stage Is discrimination, The tightening of rules Around the necks of the Dalit castes.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
09 Mar 2026
The tragic accident involving Sahil Dhaneshra, a 23-year-old youth brimming with promise, a wall adorned with medals, and the inconsolable anguish of a mother, has shaken the nation and compelled us t
apicture Richa Walia
09 Mar 2026
Indian men are extremely safety-conscious. We are so concerned about women's safety that we have decided the safest place for them is inside a cage designed entirely by us.
apicture Robert Clements
09 Mar 2026