Muscling Constitution

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
23 Jan 2023
As if the efforts from the government are not enough, some constitutional persons too have joined the chorus to take on the judiciary.

The recent weeks witnessed an avalanche of attacks against the apex court. Significantly, it came not only from the government but from a couple of constitutional bodies too. The appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and the High Courts has always been a matter of tussle between the Central government and the Collegium of the Supreme Court. 

There were occasions when the government sent back to the Collegium the names suggested by it for reconsideration. But it usually got solved with the Collegium sending the file again to the government recommending the same names; and the government, without creating a fuss, used to clear it.

It is not so in the Narendra Modi regime. It has become a rule, unlike an exception earlier, for the government to return files, containing the names of probable judges, to the Collegium. 

Adding insult to injury, the government sits over even those names which have been reiterated by the Collegium. Reports suggest that there are over 100 recommendations made by the Collegium of high courts pending with the government. 

Similarly, there are reportedly the names of 10 judges recommended for elevation which have not got the green signal from the Centre. 

Now comes the bolt from the blue. The Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju has written a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating that the government should have a bigger say in the appointments to the higher judiciary. He has proposed that a government nominee should be included in the search committee which will shortlist names to the High Courts and Supreme Court Collegium. 

In other words, the government wants to have its nominees as Judges in the higher courts. The whole effort seems like an overbearing government breathing down the judiciary’s neck. The government has almost achieved its target of having its ‘yes men’ in Raj Bhavans across the country and as heads of many other bodies. It has apparently not achieved its target in the judiciary, and the present efforts are nothing but a bid to tackle it.

As if the efforts from the government are not enough, some constitutional persons too have joined the chorus to take on the judiciary. That is what the Rajya Sabha chairperson Jagdeep Dhankhar and the Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla did at a conference of all-India presiding officers in Jaipur recently. 

Dhankhar even questioned the judicial mandate of ‘non-violation of the basic structure of the Constitution’, stating that the Parliament must have the right to amend the Constitution in whichever way it wants. The Lok Sabha Speaker too remarked that judiciary should respect the sanctity of the legislative body, indirectly hinting at the supremacy of the Parliament. 

It seems those holding constitutional posts are dismissive of the basic structure of the Constitution which includes fundamental rights, federal structure of the state, judicial review, etc. If these corner stones are allowed to be trampled upon by elected bodies, democracy would become meaningless. 

It is important to take note of what B. R. Ambedkar said: “All of us are aware of the fact that rights are nothing unless remedies are provided whereby people can seek to obtain redress when rights are invaded.” If the supremacy of the Supreme Court is overstepped by any legislative body, who will be there to redress violation of even the fundamental rights of ordinary mortals?

Recent Posts

Fifty years after the Emergency, the debate has shifted from suspended Democracy to whether democratic institutions can be hollowed out while elections continue and constitutional forms remain outward
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
06 Jul 2026
Is India moving forward or slipping backwards? Growing concerns over democratic institutions, civil liberties, economic inequality, and constitutional values have kept the national debate over whether
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
06 Jul 2026
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has declared the right to walk on safe, well-maintained footpaths a fundamental right, placing pedestrians at the centre of constitutional protection and challe
apicture Dr. Pauly Mathew Muricken
06 Jul 2026
The passport controversy has raised uncomfortable questions about citizenship, administrative accountability and legal interpretation. Far from settling the issue, official assertions have triggered f
apicture Joseph Maliakan
06 Jul 2026
If Stan Swamy, the Martyr, were alive today, he would be in the midst of the Adivasis. His life would be very simple and frugal. He would eat their food, sing their songs, and dance with them. He woul
apicture Cedric Prakash
06 Jul 2026
Synthetic narcotics, digital trafficking and organised crime are reshaping India's drug landscape. As Goa, Kerala and neighbouring states witness alarming spikes in abuse and fatalities, the country's
apicture Pachu Menon
06 Jul 2026
They did not fall like accidents. They were arranged: Dalit bodies laid out In the neat geometry of hate.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
06 Jul 2026
one day we will wake up to discover that while we faithfully believed it was day, our rulers had quietly turned it into night...
apicture Robert Clements
06 Jul 2026
As new restrictions tighten around churches and civil society organisations, those likely to suffer most are the poor, the marginalised, and the forgotten communities who rely on faith-based instituti
apicture John Dayal
29 Jun 2026
From Chhattisgarh to North Korea, Nigeria to Iraq, the faces of persecution differ, but the outcome remains the same: shrinking freedoms, shattered communities and an international human-rights system
apicture Oliver D'Souza
29 Jun 2026