hidden image

Welcome Guidelines : Maintenance in Matrimonial Matters

Aarti Aarti
16 Nov 2020

It is believed that marriages are made in heaven and the institution of marriage is greatly revered across nations. An Ecuadorian couple (110-year-old husband and his wife six years younger to him) who recently celebrated their 80 wedding anniversary attributed love, maturity and respect for each other to be their recipe towards achieving a long and happy marriage. 

It is also a cause for concern that matrimonial disputes are on the rise in recent years. Some marriages seem to break up in no time like what happened to a couple in a Middle East country last year where the woman was divorced just after three minutes of marriage.
 
Although marital infidelity, job loss, financial strain, unrealistic expectations, among others may trigger matrimonial discords, the situation leading to separation or divorce can create a plethora of psychological, social problems including short and long-term health problems.  Men are more likely to feel anger and rejection. Women may suffer more from financial support and loss of status. However, both men and women face harrowing experiences in trying to deal with “divorce stress syndrome” during and after a split. Having studied more than 8000 people, American sociologists have concluded that the shock and disruption caused by the ending of a marriage can cause much anxiety as also damage the immune system which makes them vulnerable to avoidable chronic diseases.
 
In India, there are no official statistics related to divorce and separation. But many women who are divorced by their former husbands have to fight it out legally in order to receive maintenance in order to support themselves and their children. Even as a married woman can claim maintenance under various laws like the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 and the protection of women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954, most often the former husbands seem to try every possible means to reduce the maintenance payments or delay it.
 
Courts have held that maintenance is dependent upon factual situations and it should mould the claim for maintenance based on various factors brought before it. The maintenance amount awarded must be reasonable and realistic, and avoid either of the two extremes i.e. maintenance awarded to the wife should neither be so extravagant which becomes oppressive and unbearable for the respondent, nor should it be so meagre that it drives the wife to penury. The sufficiency of the quantum has to be adjudged so that the wife is able to maintain herself with reasonable comfort.
 
In order to claim maintenance, the relationship of husband and wife should be proved, that she must be unable to maintain herself, the husband must be having sufficient means and it needs to be proved that the husband neglected or refused to maintain his wife. Moreover even a wife who has been divorced is entitled to claim maintenance from her husband provided that she has not re-married. Whether such a wife has been divorced by her husband or she has obtained divorced or the marriage was divorced by mutual consent, she would still be entitled to claim maintenance under the maintenance act.
 
In a path breaking judgment on 4 November this year the Supreme Court of India while deciding a criminal appeal in Rajnesh versus Neha, has framed guidelines for determining the quantum of interim maintenance to be awarded during pendency of matrimonial matters from the day it had been filed. The wife had left the matrimonial home in 2013 shortly after the birth of her son. Based on her application for interim maintenance on behalf of herself and her minor son, the Family Court had awarded interim maintenance of Rs 15000 per month to her and Rs 5000 per month for her minor son from September 2013 to August 2015 which was revised to Rs 10000 per month from September 2015 onwards till further orders were passed in the main petition. The wife’s plea for maintenance dragged through various courts for seven years until it reached the Supreme Court. The husband admitted and acknowledged before the Apex Court that an amount of Rs.5,00,000 was pending towards arrears of maintenance but submitted that he was presently unemployed and was not in a position to pay maintenance.
 
The Court noted that the objective of granting interim/permanent alimony is to ensure that the dependent spouse is not reduced to destitution or vagrancy on account of the failure of the marriage, and not as a punishment to the other spouse. Maintaining that there was no straitjacket formula for fixing the quantum of maintenance to be awarded, it has laid down a number of criteria for calculating the quantum of maintenance. Notably, detailed affidavits disclosing all sources of income at the time of application of maintenance has to be filed before the court. So, husbands will not be able to dispose of assets during the pendency of matrimonial cases. The maintenance which is to be paid from the date of filing of the petition will have to include the basic needs of the wife, expenses of children and ought to factor in inflation while calculating the alimony amount. In case the woman had given up her job after marriage to look after the children, the loss of that income must also be factored in the maintenance payable.
 
To overcome the issue of overlapping jurisdiction, and avoid conflicting orders being passed in different proceedings, the Supreme Court has directed where successive claims for maintenance are made by a party under different statutes, the Court would consider an adjustment or set-off, of the amount awarded in the previous proceeding/s, while determining whether any further amount is to be awarded in the subsequent proceeding. It is thus mandatory for the applicant to disclose the previous proceeding and the orders passed therein, in the subsequent proceeding and if the order passed in the previous proceeding/s requires any modification or variation, it would be required to be done in the same proceeding. 
 
There is an imperative need for effective implementation of the latest guidelines as this will go a long way in ensuring that the quantum of alimony is computed fairly. Most importantly it will benefit many women who are solely dependent on their husbands for maintenance for they  will not be deprived of their rights after separation.

Recent Posts

Communal hatred, seeded by colonial divide-and-rule and revived by modern majoritarianism, is corroding India's syncretic culture. Yet acts of everyday courage remind us that constitutional values and
apicture Ram Puniyani
16 Feb 2026
What appears as cultural homage is, in fact, political signalling. By elevating Vande Mataram symbolism over inclusion, the state is diminishing the national anthem, unsettling hard-won consensus, and
apicture A. J. Philip
16 Feb 2026
States are increasingly becoming laboratories of hate; the experiment will ultimately consume the nation itself. The choice before India is stark: reaffirm constitutional citizenship, or allow adminis
apicture John Dayal
16 Feb 2026
Mamata Banerjee's personal appearance before the Supreme Court of India has transformed a procedural dispute over SIR into a constitutional warning—questioning whether institutions meant to safeguard
apicture Oliver D'Souza
16 Feb 2026
This is a book by two redoubtable Jesuit scholars. Lancy Lobo is currently the Research Director of the Indian Social Institute in New Delhi, while Denzil Fernandes was its former Executive Director.
apicture Chhotebhai
16 Feb 2026
The cry "Why am I poor?" exposes a world where fear of the other, corrupted politics, and dollar-driven power reduce millions to "children of a lesser god." Abundance will coexist with deprivation, an
apicture Peter Fernandes
16 Feb 2026
O Water! There is a facade of democracy. In which caste is appropriated As a religious tool, To strengthen the caste hierarchy For touching their water.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
16 Feb 2026
From Washington's muscle diplomacy to Hindutva's cultural majoritarianism, a dangerous erosion of values is reshaping global and Indian politics. When power replaces principle and identity overrides j
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
16 Feb 2026
In today's world, governance is not merely about policies. It is about performance. The teleprompter screen must glow. The sentences must glide. The applause must arrive on cue.
apicture Robert Clements
16 Feb 2026
From Godhra to Assam, a once-neutral word has been weaponised to stigmatise, harass, and exclude a section of the people. This is not a linguistic accident but a political design wherein power turns l
apicture A. J. Philip
09 Feb 2026