hidden image

Welcome Guidelines : Maintenance in Matrimonial Matters

Aarti Aarti
16 Nov 2020

It is believed that marriages are made in heaven and the institution of marriage is greatly revered across nations. An Ecuadorian couple (110-year-old husband and his wife six years younger to him) who recently celebrated their 80 wedding anniversary attributed love, maturity and respect for each other to be their recipe towards achieving a long and happy marriage. 

It is also a cause for concern that matrimonial disputes are on the rise in recent years. Some marriages seem to break up in no time like what happened to a couple in a Middle East country last year where the woman was divorced just after three minutes of marriage.
 
Although marital infidelity, job loss, financial strain, unrealistic expectations, among others may trigger matrimonial discords, the situation leading to separation or divorce can create a plethora of psychological, social problems including short and long-term health problems.  Men are more likely to feel anger and rejection. Women may suffer more from financial support and loss of status. However, both men and women face harrowing experiences in trying to deal with “divorce stress syndrome” during and after a split. Having studied more than 8000 people, American sociologists have concluded that the shock and disruption caused by the ending of a marriage can cause much anxiety as also damage the immune system which makes them vulnerable to avoidable chronic diseases.
 
In India, there are no official statistics related to divorce and separation. But many women who are divorced by their former husbands have to fight it out legally in order to receive maintenance in order to support themselves and their children. Even as a married woman can claim maintenance under various laws like the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 and the protection of women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954, most often the former husbands seem to try every possible means to reduce the maintenance payments or delay it.
 
Courts have held that maintenance is dependent upon factual situations and it should mould the claim for maintenance based on various factors brought before it. The maintenance amount awarded must be reasonable and realistic, and avoid either of the two extremes i.e. maintenance awarded to the wife should neither be so extravagant which becomes oppressive and unbearable for the respondent, nor should it be so meagre that it drives the wife to penury. The sufficiency of the quantum has to be adjudged so that the wife is able to maintain herself with reasonable comfort.
 
In order to claim maintenance, the relationship of husband and wife should be proved, that she must be unable to maintain herself, the husband must be having sufficient means and it needs to be proved that the husband neglected or refused to maintain his wife. Moreover even a wife who has been divorced is entitled to claim maintenance from her husband provided that she has not re-married. Whether such a wife has been divorced by her husband or she has obtained divorced or the marriage was divorced by mutual consent, she would still be entitled to claim maintenance under the maintenance act.
 
In a path breaking judgment on 4 November this year the Supreme Court of India while deciding a criminal appeal in Rajnesh versus Neha, has framed guidelines for determining the quantum of interim maintenance to be awarded during pendency of matrimonial matters from the day it had been filed. The wife had left the matrimonial home in 2013 shortly after the birth of her son. Based on her application for interim maintenance on behalf of herself and her minor son, the Family Court had awarded interim maintenance of Rs 15000 per month to her and Rs 5000 per month for her minor son from September 2013 to August 2015 which was revised to Rs 10000 per month from September 2015 onwards till further orders were passed in the main petition. The wife’s plea for maintenance dragged through various courts for seven years until it reached the Supreme Court. The husband admitted and acknowledged before the Apex Court that an amount of Rs.5,00,000 was pending towards arrears of maintenance but submitted that he was presently unemployed and was not in a position to pay maintenance.
 
The Court noted that the objective of granting interim/permanent alimony is to ensure that the dependent spouse is not reduced to destitution or vagrancy on account of the failure of the marriage, and not as a punishment to the other spouse. Maintaining that there was no straitjacket formula for fixing the quantum of maintenance to be awarded, it has laid down a number of criteria for calculating the quantum of maintenance. Notably, detailed affidavits disclosing all sources of income at the time of application of maintenance has to be filed before the court. So, husbands will not be able to dispose of assets during the pendency of matrimonial cases. The maintenance which is to be paid from the date of filing of the petition will have to include the basic needs of the wife, expenses of children and ought to factor in inflation while calculating the alimony amount. In case the woman had given up her job after marriage to look after the children, the loss of that income must also be factored in the maintenance payable.
 
To overcome the issue of overlapping jurisdiction, and avoid conflicting orders being passed in different proceedings, the Supreme Court has directed where successive claims for maintenance are made by a party under different statutes, the Court would consider an adjustment or set-off, of the amount awarded in the previous proceeding/s, while determining whether any further amount is to be awarded in the subsequent proceeding. It is thus mandatory for the applicant to disclose the previous proceeding and the orders passed therein, in the subsequent proceeding and if the order passed in the previous proceeding/s requires any modification or variation, it would be required to be done in the same proceeding. 
 
There is an imperative need for effective implementation of the latest guidelines as this will go a long way in ensuring that the quantum of alimony is computed fairly. Most importantly it will benefit many women who are solely dependent on their husbands for maintenance for they  will not be deprived of their rights after separation.

Recent Posts

India's political summer is witnessing impulsive governance, bulldozer crackdowns, and inflammatory rhetoric symbolised by "cockroaches." From hurried populism to selective demolitions and anti-minori
apicture Julian S Das
25 May 2026
India's discomfort with a Norwegian cartoon and European questions about press freedom expose the erosion of democratic accountability. The issue is not foreign criticism, but a leadership culture tha
apicture A. J. Philip
25 May 2026
Amid the BJP's growing dominance and the weakening of opposition forces, Kerala's UDF victory under VD Satheesan offers Congress a rare chance to build a secular, employment-driven governance model ro
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
25 May 2026
In his message for World Communications Day, Pope Leo XIV urges communicators to preserve human voices and faces amid AI's growing influence. He warns against technological dehumanisation and challeng
apicture Cedric Prakash
25 May 2026
Strikes and protests are vital democratic tools in India, but the Mahila Morcha's KSRTC protest before Kerala's new government assumed office was marked by legal ignorance and political theatrics. Ele
apicture Jijo Thomas Placheril
25 May 2026
Punjab's new sacrilege law, introduced by the Bhagwant Mann government, creates sweeping non-bailable offences that could intimidate converts, minorities, scholars, and ordinary citizens while deepeni
apicture John Dayal
25 May 2026
If the Chandala, i.e., untouchable, hears the Veda, then molten lead must be poured into his ears; if he recites the Veda, then his tongue should be cut off; if he memorises Veda, then his body must b
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
25 May 2026
Donald Trump went to Beijing like a wounded soldier, seeking attention and assistance after his Iran misadventure, and returned almost empty-handed after what seemed an eager shopping expedition. He c
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
25 May 2026
For the first time in years, the cockroaches may actually seem like a refreshing change from the polished hypocrites and well-dressed impostors who have crawled through our political system pretending
apicture Robert Clements
25 May 2026
VD Satheesan emerges as a leader shaped by accessibility, intellect, and democratic openness rather than authoritarianism. His rise reflects Kerala's desire for generational change, responsive governa
apicture A. J. Philip
18 May 2026