hidden image

Our Right to Dissent

P. A. Joseph P. A. Joseph
15 Jan 2024
We the people of India having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic Republic, and to secure to all its citizens, justice, social, economic, political, liberty of thought, ex<x>pressions, belief, faith,

It was the school assembly. The guest speaker asked the students: "whose school is this"? One student answered: "This school belongs to the Principal," and another answered: "This school belongs to the school managing committee". The speaker was unsatisfied. Then came forward a brilliant student. She answered: "This school belongs to all of us: the management, the principal, the teachers, the helping staff, and all of us students". The guest speaker was pleased. The school belongs to all of us.

The same question can be asked about our nation. In the preamble of the Constitution, we read: "We the people of India having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic Republic, and to secure to all its citizens, justice, social, economic, political, liberty of thought, expressions, belief, faith, and worship, equality of status, and opportunity, and to promote among them all fraternity, and assuring the dignity of the individual, unity and integrity of the nation. In our constituent assembly on this day 26th, November 1949, we here adopt and enact and give to ourselves this Constitution."

We are the agents to administer, serve and develop our nation towards peace and prosperity, and all have to be involved in this programme and process. In our democratic nation, MPs and MLAs are representatives of the people. Their job is to represent the different needs through agreement and dissent to reach a consensus. According to DY Chandrachud, the Chief Justice of India, dissent is the safety valve for democracy. Without proper dissent, democracy would collapse, and the nation would fall into autocracy and feudalism. Hence, any attempt to curb or silence dissent is to instil fear in the minds of the elected representatives in violation of constitutional values, undemocratic, and anti-national.

Commitment to protecting deliberative dialogue is an essential aspect of any democracy. The true test of a democracy is its ability to ensure the creation and protection of spaces where every individual can voice one's opinion without fear and retribution. Every person from any state, race, language, belief, or culture must experience free and safe exercise in the ambience of the sacred place of the parliament/assembly. Providing a space to a multitude of cultures of the Indian Union is respecting the people's right to dissent.

The making of our nation is not of a day but a continuous process to be activated by every individual. No one can claim a monopoly, however strong one or the institution one represents is. The framers of the Constitution rejected the idea of a Hindu India or a Muslim India. They recognized the Republic of India. Our differences are not our weakness, but our ability to transcend the differences is our strength. India is a sub-continent of diversity and pluralism.

Healthy dissent is the invitation and demand to return to the constitutional path. Further, protecting dissent is a reminder that we democratically elect the government following the guidelines of the Constitution we have accepted. It is imperative for the healthy running of the nation. No one has the power to extinguish dissent under the pretext of discipline. The president of the parliament/assembly is only a guide to coordinate and not to command. Even their role and power is given by the elected representatives.

Recent Posts

In a 1947 address at the University of Allahabad, Jawaharlal Nehru envisioned universities as temples of humanism, reason and truth. Today, shrinking public funding, rampant privatisation, ideological
apicture G Ramachandram
02 Mar 2026
At Rashtrapati Bhavan, replacing Edwin Lutyens' bust with C Rajagopalachari is framed as decolonisation, yet, in truth, it reflects a broader politics of renaming under Narendra Modi—symbolism over su
apicture A. J. Philip
02 Mar 2026
Gen-Z call to make leaders rely on public schools and hospitals underscores youth priorities—education, health care, and jobs—amid rising freebies, inequality, and weak public investment. The Supreme
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
02 Mar 2026
Major Archbishop Raphael Thattil's micro-minority appeal coincides with Kerala's delayed response to the Justice JB Koshy Commission, whose recommendations aim to address internal Christian disparitie
apicture John Dayal
02 Mar 2026
The All India Catholic Union warns of rising violence, legal curbs, and social exclusion targeting Christians across the Northeast, citing unrest in Manipur and enforcement of the Arunachal Pradesh Fr
apicture IC Correspondent
02 Mar 2026
The 2002 Gujarat violence, following the Sabarmati Express tragedy, became one of independent India's darkest chapters. Allegations of state complicity, contested investigations, and enduring survivor
apicture Cedric Prakash
02 Mar 2026
In his second encyclical, Laudato Si': On Care for Our Common Home (2015), Pope Francis offers a sustained moral critique of consumerism, unrestrained economic expansion, and ecological indifference.
apicture Joseph Maliakan
02 Mar 2026
As nuclear powers like the United States and Russia modernise vast arsenals while policing others, critics decry a double standard embedded in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The world risks bec
apicture P. A. Chacko
02 Mar 2026
O Jurist Dr. Gregory Stanton, You talked of genocide in ten slow steps I come from a land Where we have been walking those steps For six thousand years Without shoes, Without dignity, Without
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
02 Mar 2026
The robotic dog is not the real problem. It is the comfort we now have with make-believe. It is the applause that follows every convenient explanation.
apicture Robert Clements
02 Mar 2026