hidden image

Our Right to Dissent

P. A. Joseph P. A. Joseph
15 Jan 2024
We the people of India having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic Republic, and to secure to all its citizens, justice, social, economic, political, liberty of thought, ex<x>pressions, belief, faith,

It was the school assembly. The guest speaker asked the students: "whose school is this"? One student answered: "This school belongs to the Principal," and another answered: "This school belongs to the school managing committee". The speaker was unsatisfied. Then came forward a brilliant student. She answered: "This school belongs to all of us: the management, the principal, the teachers, the helping staff, and all of us students". The guest speaker was pleased. The school belongs to all of us.

The same question can be asked about our nation. In the preamble of the Constitution, we read: "We the people of India having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic Republic, and to secure to all its citizens, justice, social, economic, political, liberty of thought, expressions, belief, faith, and worship, equality of status, and opportunity, and to promote among them all fraternity, and assuring the dignity of the individual, unity and integrity of the nation. In our constituent assembly on this day 26th, November 1949, we here adopt and enact and give to ourselves this Constitution."

We are the agents to administer, serve and develop our nation towards peace and prosperity, and all have to be involved in this programme and process. In our democratic nation, MPs and MLAs are representatives of the people. Their job is to represent the different needs through agreement and dissent to reach a consensus. According to DY Chandrachud, the Chief Justice of India, dissent is the safety valve for democracy. Without proper dissent, democracy would collapse, and the nation would fall into autocracy and feudalism. Hence, any attempt to curb or silence dissent is to instil fear in the minds of the elected representatives in violation of constitutional values, undemocratic, and anti-national.

Commitment to protecting deliberative dialogue is an essential aspect of any democracy. The true test of a democracy is its ability to ensure the creation and protection of spaces where every individual can voice one's opinion without fear and retribution. Every person from any state, race, language, belief, or culture must experience free and safe exercise in the ambience of the sacred place of the parliament/assembly. Providing a space to a multitude of cultures of the Indian Union is respecting the people's right to dissent.

The making of our nation is not of a day but a continuous process to be activated by every individual. No one can claim a monopoly, however strong one or the institution one represents is. The framers of the Constitution rejected the idea of a Hindu India or a Muslim India. They recognized the Republic of India. Our differences are not our weakness, but our ability to transcend the differences is our strength. India is a sub-continent of diversity and pluralism.

Healthy dissent is the invitation and demand to return to the constitutional path. Further, protecting dissent is a reminder that we democratically elect the government following the guidelines of the Constitution we have accepted. It is imperative for the healthy running of the nation. No one has the power to extinguish dissent under the pretext of discipline. The president of the parliament/assembly is only a guide to coordinate and not to command. Even their role and power is given by the elected representatives.

Recent Posts

Contrary to judicial relief, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed that Dalit Christians lose Scheduled Caste status upon conversion, sustaining a controversial 1950 order and deepening anxieties over equa
apicture John Dayal
30 Mar 2026
The recent verdict of the Supreme Court of India on whether Dalit Christians can claim Scheduled Caste status would have been less troubling had it merely erred in law. What makes it profoundly disqui
apicture A. J. Philip
30 Mar 2026
Justice delivery in India depends equally on the judiciary and the executive, yet systemic failures, such as case backlogs, overuse of stringent laws, and prolonged detentions, undermine liberty and f
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
30 Mar 2026
The Allahabad High Court's recent ruling in the case involving Rev. Father Vineet Vincent Pereira has sparked significant debate. The court refused to quash proceedings under Section 295A of the India
apicture Special Correspondent
30 Mar 2026
Commemorating Oscar Romero's martyrdom is recalling his fearless defence of the poor, his call to resist injustice, and his sacrifice. It challenges India today to confront oppression, uphold truth, a
apicture Cedric Prakash
30 Mar 2026
Withdrawing futile treatment is not euthanasia but an ethical, lawful act grounded in dignity and autonomy, supporting living wills and compassionate end-of-life care. Misleading words like "passive e
apicture J Charles Davis
30 Mar 2026
In the present context of growing ineffectiveness of the United Nations to curb international conflicts and its failure to provide international peace and security, and in the face of unilateralism of
apicture G Ramachandram
30 Mar 2026
Your tenth stage Is denial: The washing of hands In the blood of semantics.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
30 Mar 2026
The current budget for 2026-27 signals a renewed commitment to urban development, earmarking INR 1 billion (?1 lakh crore) for the 'Urban Challenge Fund' with the ambitious goal of transforming cities
apicture Fr. John Felix Raj & Prabhat Kumar Datta
30 Mar 2026
Perhaps what we need is a small board outside every office of authority. A simple reminder. "You are here temporarily. Please do not disturb permanent memories."
apicture Robert Clements
30 Mar 2026