hidden image

Hindu Rashtra is an illusion, it is also a lie

Lancy Lobo Lancy Lobo
18 Jan 2021

India has taken so sharp a turn in recent years that the very centre has shifted considerably. What led to this swing? Is it possible to trace the path to this point? Is there a way back to the just, secular, inclusive vision of our Constitution-makers?  These are the questions that Aakar Patel wrestles with in this book Our Hindu Rashtra: what it is, how we got there?* 

Aakar Patel, columnist and former executive director of Amnesty International India, was arrested and then let out on bail earlier this week for allegedly posting “offensive” tweets against Modi and the Ghanchi community in Gujarat. In general he has been consistently doing fearless critical political commentary and has been known as Modi–Shah baiter.

Amnesty International itself has been forced to halt its India operations due to "reprisals" from the government. The watchdog also accused the government of pursuing a "witch-hunt" against human rights organizations.

This book is about how India became majoritarian, privileging one community over others. The Indian constitution did not officially privilege the rights of one community or privilege one religion over the others. Under the Modi regime the constitutional goals and the lived reality have continued to lose resemblance to the values of the constitution. “Minorities are actively and regularly persecuted, dissent is punished, the judiciary is unable to balance executive overreach, freedoms are restricted often to the point  of being absent and the State is vicious” (p.2). Patel further states that India under Modi, “did not approach the brutalization of its minorities through constitutional change, but through existing law and policy and, above all through the issues  that parties and governments picked and stayed focused on till the majoritarian  impact was achieved” (p. 2).

Hindu Rashtra is an illusion. It is also a lie. The name promises something which reality will never deliver.  It has no ideology or theory but has an agenda. “It is purely about the exclusion and persecution of India’s minorities, particularly Muslims. That is the only meaning of Hindu Rastra in India. It imagines India as a Hindu nation where the Muslim and Christian exist on sufferance”(p.14).  It has created the myth of appeasement of Muslims by Congress, used the cow as symbol for the unification of Hindus and passed anti–cow slaughter bills and Acts. 
The Judiciary has been supremely complicit along with other arms of the State. This was demonstrated in the Ayodhya Mosque-temple issue, Kashmir issue as well as punishing crimes that did not happen.  Patel exposes the hypocrisy, subterfuge, craftiness, sophistry and cunning of Hindutvavadis. Against Christians they have passed anti-conversion bills and measures to keep Scheduled castes and Tribes from leaving the Hindu fold fearing demographic imbalance largely for vote banks. There is a very rich discussion on conversion and its rationale and the counterveiling forces triggered by Hindutva.

This book is structured in four parts. “The first looks at Pakistan and how it became the majoritarian State it is today. The second part is about the core individuals behind the Hindutva ideology and their intellectual output, which has been examined and connected to its politics. The third part, the longest, is the manner in which the democratic, secular republic of India has become majoritarian by law over time. India has done so in a more devious fashion than Pakistan, by privileging Hindutva and discriminating and restricting the rights of its minorities, while pretending to be secular and pluralist. The fourth part, is about more recent events. It looks at the way in which brute force of majoritarianism was successfully resisted in a democratic and peaceful way in our time”(p.16).

The last chapter suggests ways in which Indians can push back against Hindutva majoritarianism.  The tools  are in the Article 19 of the Constitution that all citizens have the right to freedom of speech and expression; to assemble peaceably and without arms; to form associations or unions; to move freely through the territory of India; to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India; and to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business. “Reclaiming our fundamental rights is the answer to the problems of Indian majoritarianism. We have to peacefully reclaim our rights both at the level of individual and the level of civil society”(p 337).  The peaceful Shaeenbagh protest against CAA, NPR and NRC has put the Modi-Shah regime on the back-foot. The  peaceful farmers’ protest going on now in Delhi and other parts of India has sent the Modi-Shah regime into the silent zone.  

“It is through mass individual participation in every day activism, through raising of voices, through funding just causes and funding organized civil society groups, through supporting progressive calls for engagement and supporting those who need that the Western democracies have become open societies (p. 340).  India too has no other route. ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice’ (Dr. Martin Luther King Jr).

This book is written in a language that is lucid, without jargon, highly reader friendly, analytical, well argued, well supported with facts and insights, showing the trajectory of majoritarianism and how to counter it. It should appeal to  minority communities, youth, students, activists and intellectuals. 


(*Our Hindu Rashtra: what it is, how we got there? By Aakar Patel.  Chennai: Westland Publications. 2020. Price.650/-)
 

Recent Posts

The current delimitation hullaballoo provides insight into democracy's struggle to balance representation and power. Rising tensions between the North and the South are not without reason. Given the B
apicture Aakash
10 Mar 2025
Emperor Aurangzeb was 88 years old and had ruled the country for 49 years when he died in 1707. Unlike any other leader, he had much to boast about. He ruled over a population of 150 million people. H
apicture A. J. Philip
10 Mar 2025
AI has revolutionised industries, but it mirrors the societal biases of those who created it. This is visible in the gender disparities exhibited by AI tools. From recruitment discrimination to skewed
apicture Jaswant Kaur
10 Mar 2025
India has undergone a radical political shift from its initial outlook. The increasing marginalisation of minorities, the rise of Hindutva majoritarianism, weaponisation of laws, and hate speech neces
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
10 Mar 2025
As the bulldozers continue to go on a rampage, demolishing and destroying the lives and homes of the vulnerable, it is time that the fascist and dictatorial rulers of the world realise that "this land
apicture Cedric Prakash
10 Mar 2025
Smartphone use in schools has become a global challenge. The detail lies in balancing education and well-being. While bans tackle classroom distractions and cyberbullying, some claim it hinders digita
apicture Anantha Padmanabhan
10 Mar 2025
Arunachal faces a dark turning point as the 1978 Freedom of Religion Act is revived. Peaceful coexistence is at stake as the BJP creates another Manipur-like situation. Have no lessons been learned?
apicture Chhotebhai
10 Mar 2025
A glance through Kerala's archive of traditional art forms reveals that folk songs originated from the philosophies of forefathers. With no language barriers to restrict them from communicating with e
apicture Pachu Menon
10 Mar 2025
Tamil Nadu's resistance to Hindi imposition has revealed the federation's insensitivity to diversity. The Centre's insistence on the three-language formula is a joke, given the declining multilinguali
apicture G Ramachandram
10 Mar 2025
As they say, actions speak louder than words—or, in this case, louder than tweets. So, Mr. Prime Minister, while the country appreciates the gesture, how about some solid policies, airtight laws, and
apicture Robert Clements
10 Mar 2025