hidden image

Bulldozer Justice!

Robert Clements Robert Clements
31 Mar 2025

The first time I saw a bulldozer, it was an awe-inspiring sight. A giant machine, powerful and imposing, tearing through mounds of earth with a mechanical efficiency that seemed almost hypnotic. It was a thing of purpose—used to build roads, clear debris, and shape landscapes.
Lately, however, the bulldozer has taken on a new role: judge, jury, and executioner.

A bulldozer used against someone accused of a crime is the equivalent of using a sledgehammer to swat a fly. It is brute force, untempered by logic or law.

It is not justice; it is vengeance. And if history has taught us anything, it is that vengeance has an insatiable appetite.

The practice begins subtly. It starts with criminals—real, hardened criminals, whom no one will defend. Their homes are razed, their possessions buried under the weight of state-sponsored retribution. And the people cheer. "Good riddance," they say. "Let the bulldozer teach them a lesson."

But justice, my dear reader, is a fickle thing when left in the hands of power without accountability. Yesterday, it was the criminal. Today, it is the dissenter. Tomorrow? Well, tomorrow it could be you. Because one day, you might find yourself disagreeing with someone in power.

One day, you might make a statement, write a post, or raise a question that doesn't sit well with the ruling forces.

And on that day, the bulldozer might come for you.

Will you cheer then? Or will you watch in silent horror, realising too late that by tolerating bulldozer justice for others, you invited it upon yourselves?

"Look at the crime," we are told, "Don't look at the method of punishment."
But isn't that the very essence of civilisation—that punishment must be fair, proportionate, and legal? Once the bulldozer becomes the gavel, the courtroom ceases to exist.

And when the courtroom ceases to exist, so does the very concept of justice.

Laws are meant to protect us, not pulverise us. They are meant to ensure due process, not dictate destruction. The moment we normalise punishment outside the legal framework, we exchange democracy for dictatorship, rights for ruin, and fairness for fear.

So, let's ask ourselves: Do we want to live in a nation where homes are razed at the whim of authority? Where punishment is carried out not in courts but in the streets? Where power is measured in the weight of demolition rather than the strength of the law?

The time to act is now before the rumbling of the bulldozer becomes the soundtrack of our silence. Before we wake up to find that justice, like the homes it once protected, has been reduced to rubble…!

Recent Posts

A diplomatic dinner is more than a meal; it is cultural diplomacy on a plate. India has every right to showcase its magnificent vegetarian cuisine, but excluding its equally rich non-vegetarian tradit
apicture A. J. Philip
21 Sep 2026
Ageing need not mean becoming a burden. With the right opportunities, senior citizens can remain productive, creative and socially engaged. Kerala's emerging Silver Economy offers the Church and civil
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
21 Sep 2026
Congress asked Karnataka's Christians to trust its promise to repeal the anti-conversion law. Three years later, the law remains. Repeated meetings, assurances and memoranda have only served to produc
apicture John Dayal
21 Sep 2026
Accountability is travelling from official files to the grassroots. "School Thik Karo" may be satire's latest avatar, but its questions about India's public schools are real.
apicture Pachu Menon
21 Sep 2026
India's education system is in terminal decline because of short-sightedness and corrupt, incompetent academic leadership. The public education system is practically dismantled. Ever since the Nationa
apicture G Ramachandram
21 Sep 2026
A major strength of the book is that Menamparampil does not examine these issues merely as political or theological problems. He approaches them through human relationships, collective identities, soc
apicture K. Jose, SVD
21 Sep 2026
I am tired of the Indian theorists MN Srinivas, Bhikku Parekh, Ashish Nandy, Akeel Bilgrami,
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
21 Sep 2026
The voter is sovereign. The electoral roll exists for the voter. The election exists for the voter. The government ultimately derives legitimacy from the voter. When crores disappear from electoral ro
apicture Oliver D'Souza
21 Sep 2026
The Bible is filled with rulers who believed they could contain God. Today, their thrones are gone, their empires are history, and many of their names are remembered only because they tried to stop Hi
apicture Robert Clements
21 Sep 2026
India's daughters are still treated as someone else's property, burdened by patriarchy, denied autonomy and forced to surrender independence. Rahul Gandhi's women-only gathering in Pune challenged thi
apicture G Ramachandram
14 Sep 2026