The COVID-19 global pandemic has seen several
debates across the country. And its impact has been considerable on students.
Final exams in higher education are important.
However with the sudden closing down of Universities and schools across the
country since March 16 this year, after the Centre announced a nationwide
classroom shutdown to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, the student community,
especially many of those in the final year of college have been under enormous
mental distress for a plethora of reasons.
India's higher education regulator, the
University Grants Commission, issued guidelines for conducting online exams for
final year students of bachelor’s and master’s courses on 29 April this year.
Accordingly, the universities of Delhi and Panjab, among others, scheduled the
exams.
But following opposition from both students
and teachers against holding the exams amidst COVID-19, human resource
development minister Ramesh Pokhriyal wanted UGC to revisit its guidelines.
Initially the UGC cancelled the exams, but about a week later, UGC held that
the exams must be compulsorily conducted by the end of September.
Next was the confusion that prevailed amongst
University students.
One set of them sought for declaration of
results of final year/terminal semester on the basis of past
performance/internal assessment and to award mark sheets and degrees, without
conducting final exams.
Another group however challenged the decision
of the State Disaster Management Authority for not holding final term exams.
Amidst the cross fire, a circular issued by the University Grants Commission
(UGC) on 6 July 2020 rather compounded the situation.
The overarching body for all the universities
- the UGC, had, on the basis of a Report prepared by a specially constituted
Expert Committee, issued certain guidelines related to University exams.
Notably, the circular maintained that (i)
Universities are required to
complete the examinations by the end of September 2020 in offline
(pen & paper)/online/blended (online + offline) mode following the
prescribed protocols/guidelines related to COVID-19 pandemic.
The circular provided an opportunity for
examination through special chance, which in simple terms sought to provide an
opportunity through a special examination to a student of terminal
semester/final year who was unable to appear in the exam conducted by the
University for reasons whatsoever.
Universities were given the flexibility to
conduct such special exam as and when feasible as a one-time measure for the
current academic session 2019-20 so that the student was not put to any inconvenience/disadvantage.
The circular also specified that students of
terminal semester/final year students having backlog should compulsorily be
evaluated by conducting examinations in offline (pen & paper)/
online/blended (online + offline) mode as per feasibility and
suitability.
In the meanwhile, no sooner than some State
Governments announced cancellation of final-year examinations of state
universities in view of COVID-19, on the grounds they went against the rules,
misunderstanding reigned.
The UGC circular became a bone of contention
as many raised their voice against what they called "thoughtless and
hasty†decision of the UGC in the conduct of exams.
Others felt that the students had already been
evaluated for five semesters and if the final semester was calculated on the
basis of those, it wouldn’t make much difference, etc.
Initially, it was challenged in Delhi High
Court and later in the Supreme Court where over 30 University students across
13 States and one Union Territory sought for quashing the said circular.
An unrelenting UGC maintained that its
decision was taken “after due deliberation by taking into account and balancing
all relevant factors†and that its circular was issued to “protect the academic
future of studentsâ€, while keeping in mind their “health and safetyâ€. UGC
reportedly argued that “not holding examinations will not be in students’
interest as their degrees may not be recognised if the States would act
unilaterally and cancel final-year examinations in violation of UGC normsâ€.
Further, as per UGC’s statistics, out of 945 Universities in the country, data
furnished by 755 Universities (120 Deemed Universities, 274 Private
Universities, 40 Central Universities and 321 State Universities) had shown
that out of 560 Universities, 194 had conducted the exams while 366 were
planning for the same in online, offline or blended mode by September. In
addition as 27 Private Universities were established during 2019-20, their
first batch was yet to become eligible for final examination. It was also
argued that many prestigious Institutes abroad, including the MIT, Cambridge
and Oxford, have held the exams despite COVID-19.
Similarly, for instance, no sooner the
National Testing Agency announced NEET and JEE exams 2020 in September, it
evoked sharp response from several quarters. While some eagerly awaited for it
there were others who knocked at the doors of the judiciary. However on 17
August a Division Bench of the Supreme Court ruled that there was absolutely no
justification for postponement of the examination in question relating to NEET
UG-2020 as well as JEE (Main)…though there is pandemic situation, but
ultimately life has to go and the career of the students cannot be put on
peril for long and full academic year cannot be wastedâ€.
Now in the UGC matter, in its 160 page
judgment delivered on 28 August 2020, a Division Bench of the Apex Court
observed that the final year/terminal semesters examinations are important
because the learning process is a dynamic interaction where the only way to
figure out what students know is to seek evidence of their knowledge and to
evaluate it. Performance in examination especially final year/terminal semester
examination are reflection of competence of the students. Terminal semester/Final
year examination also provides an opportunity to the students to improve upon
their overall score/marks which are very crucial for academic excellence and
opportunities of employment. Final year/terminal semester examination of underÂ
Graduate or postgraduate is an opportunity for student to show his optimum
calibre which pave his future career both in academics and employment.
The essence of the direction is that students
cannot be promoted without holding final-year examinations by September 30.
However, the Court maintained that if a State
felt it could not conduct examinations by September 30, it had to approach the
UGC for new dates to hold the examinations.
Although a State Disaster Management Authority
can postpone final-year examinations under the National Disaster Management
Act, the Court said that fresh dates for the exams had to be worked out in
consultation with the UGC.
With the confusion cleared about University
exams, there is an imperative need to ensure safety of students as well as
examiners and support staff at exam centres by maintaining hygiene, ensuring
social distancing as well as safe transportation facilities, among other
precautions.
The task is onerous but unavoidable as it
involves the future of tens of thousands of our children.